Re: clean up and warnings patch for 2.6.12-rc4-mm1 i2c-chip

[Daniel Paschka <monkey20181@gmx.net>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1475 bytes --]

Alexey Fisher wrote:

> diff -uprN linux/drivers/i2c/chips/max1619.c linux-2.6-dev/drivers/i2c/chips/max1619.c
> --- linux/drivers/i2c/chips/max1619.c	2005-05-15 22:49:31.000000000 +0200
> +++ linux-2.6-dev/drivers/i2c/chips/max1619.c	2005-05-15 21:05:56.000000000 +0200
> @@ -195,6 +195,7 @@ static int max1619_detect(struct i2c_ada
>  	u8 reg_config=0, reg_convrate=0, reg_status=0;
>  	u8 man_id, chip_id;
>  	if (!i2c_check_functionality(adapter, I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_BYTE_DATA))
> +		err = -ENODEV;
>  		goto exit;


Sure about that, I think there are some brackets missing.

  
>  	if (!(data = kmalloc(sizeof(struct max1619_data), GFP_KERNEL))) {
> @@ -234,6 +235,7 @@ static int max1619_detect(struct i2c_ada
>  			dev_dbg(&adapter->dev,
>  				"MAX1619 detection failed at 0x%02x.\n",
>  				address);
> +			return -ENODEV;
>  			goto exit_free;
>  		}
>  	}


I would expect gcc to throw a warning about unreachable code here
because goto exit_free ist behind a return statement.
Don't you mean
err = -ENODEV;
goto exit_free;

That way the data structure data will be freed, too.

> @@ -254,6 +256,7 @@ static int max1619_detect(struct i2c_ada
>  			dev_info(&adapter->dev,
>  			    "Unsupported chip (man_id=0x%02X, "
>  			    "chip_id=0x%02X).\n", man_id, chip_id);
> +			return -ENODEV;
>  			goto exit_free;
>  		}

Same here.

I am not using this driver and am not fully up to date with the kernel
sources so I am sorry if I am talking nonesense here.

Bye Daniel

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 252 bytes --]