From: "K.R. Foley" <kr@cybsft.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
Cc: dino@in.ibm.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
gregoire.favre@gmail.com,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
SCSI Mailing List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: What breaks aic7xxx in post 2.6.12-rc2 ?
Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 22:07:58 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <428C030E.8030102@cybsft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1116354894.4989.42.camel@mulgrave>
James Bottomley wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 22:38 +0530, Dinakar Guniguntala wrote:
>
>>May 9 12:03:32 llm09 kernel: Vendor: IBM CORP Model: GEM312 V002 Rev: 4.1b
>>May 9 12:03:32 llm09 kernel: Type: Processor ANSI SCSI revision: 02
>
>
> OK, that's roughly what I was expecting. These processor chips tend to
> be rather basic when it comes to rates and widths.
>
> The root cause, I think, is that the aic7xxx isn't starting out at async
> narrow for the first inquiry (because the original DV code I removed did
> this, and I didn't add an equivalent back). The latest aic7xxx patch
> should sort this out.
>
> So, to get all of these changes, could you start with vanilla linus
> kernel 2.6.12-rc4 (or tree based on this, but not -mm which already has
> some of the SCSI tree included) and then apply the SCSI patch at
>
> http://parisc-linux.org/~jejb/scsi_diffs/scsi-misc-2.6.diff
>
> and see if it works?
>
> Thanks,
>
> James
>
James,
This also solves my problem that I reported in this thread
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-scsi&m=111422854418964&w=2
--
kr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-19 3:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 77+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-05-16 8:58 What breaks aic7xxx in post 2.6.12-rc2 ? Grégoire Favre
2005-05-16 15:03 ` Jesper Juhl
2005-05-16 15:12 ` What breaks aic7xxx in post 2.6.12-rc2 ? (on amd64 ?) Grégoire Favre
2005-05-16 15:31 ` Jesper Juhl
2005-05-17 7:13 ` What breaks aic7xxx in post 2.6.12-rc2 ? Dinakar Guniguntala
2005-05-17 7:29 ` Andrew Morton
2005-05-17 8:34 ` Dinakar Guniguntala
2005-05-17 14:34 ` James Bottomley
2005-05-17 15:57 ` Grégoire Favre
2005-05-17 16:38 ` James Bottomley
2005-05-17 16:52 ` Grégoire Favre
2005-05-17 18:16 ` James Bottomley
2005-05-17 17:08 ` Dinakar Guniguntala
2005-05-17 18:34 ` James Bottomley
2005-05-17 19:26 ` Grégoire Favre
2005-05-17 19:50 ` James Bottomley
2005-05-17 19:56 ` Grégoire Favre
2005-05-17 21:06 ` James Bottomley
2005-05-17 22:09 ` Grégoire Favre
2005-05-17 22:14 ` James Bottomley
2005-05-21 23:22 ` Grégoire Favre
2005-05-22 13:54 ` James Bottomley
2005-05-24 15:39 ` Grégoire Favre
2005-05-26 13:19 ` James Bottomley
2005-05-26 14:35 ` Grégoire Favre
2005-05-26 14:46 ` James Bottomley
2005-05-26 17:35 ` Grégoire Favre
2005-05-30 14:38 ` James Bottomley
2005-05-30 14:51 ` Michael Tokarev
2005-05-30 14:59 ` James Bottomley
2005-05-30 15:09 ` Grégoire Favre
2005-05-30 15:34 ` James Bottomley
2005-05-30 16:01 ` Grégoire Favre
2005-05-30 18:17 ` James Bottomley
2005-05-30 19:07 ` Grégoire Favre
2005-06-06 18:17 ` James Bottomley
2005-06-07 8:57 ` Grégoire Favre
2005-06-12 15:38 ` James Bottomley
2005-06-13 14:50 ` Grégoire Favre
2005-06-13 14:59 ` James Bottomley
2005-06-13 15:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-06-13 15:17 ` Grégoire Favre
2005-06-13 18:37 ` Gr�goire Favre
2005-06-13 20:50 ` James Bottomley
2005-06-13 21:33 ` Gregoire Favre
2005-06-13 21:46 ` James Bottomley
2005-06-13 21:59 ` Gregoire Favre
2005-06-13 22:04 ` James Bottomley
2005-06-13 22:25 ` Gregoire Favre
2005-06-14 2:20 ` James Bottomley
2005-06-14 9:28 ` What breaks aic7xxx in post 2.6.12-rc2 ? (fixed in 2.6.12-rc6 with patches) Gregoire Favre
2005-06-13 21:42 ` What breaks aic7xxx in post 2.6.12-rc2 ? Frank van Maarseveen
2005-06-13 22:59 ` James Bottomley
2005-06-14 21:42 ` Frank van Maarseveen
2005-06-15 12:02 ` Frank van Maarseveen
2005-06-15 14:14 ` James Bottomley
2005-06-15 20:09 ` Frank van Maarseveen
2005-06-15 20:15 ` James Bottomley
2005-06-15 20:15 ` James Bottomley
2005-06-15 20:49 ` Frank van Maarseveen
2005-05-18 9:07 ` Dinakar Guniguntala
2005-05-18 14:12 ` James Bottomley
2005-05-18 14:40 ` Dinakar Guniguntala
2005-05-19 3:07 ` K.R. Foley [this message]
2005-05-19 4:23 ` James Bottomley
2005-05-19 9:51 ` Dinakar Guniguntala
2005-05-19 23:56 ` James Bottomley
2005-05-20 1:05 ` K.R. Foley
2005-05-20 1:17 ` James Bottomley
2005-05-20 1:32 ` K.R. Foley
2005-05-20 1:33 ` James Bottomley
2005-05-20 1:40 ` James Bottomley
2005-05-20 1:54 ` K.R. Foley
2005-05-20 2:30 ` James Bottomley
2005-05-20 3:06 ` K.R. Foley
2005-05-20 10:09 ` Dinakar Guniguntala
2005-05-19 11:27 ` K.R. Foley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=428C030E.8030102@cybsft.com \
--to=kr@cybsft.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=dino@in.ibm.com \
--cc=gregoire.favre@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox