public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
To: DervishD <lkml@dervishd.net>
Cc: Linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND] Hard disk LBA sector count is not always the same
Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 14:31:17 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <42922175.8090005@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050523121424.GB339@DervishD>

DervishD wrote:
>     Hi all :)
> 
>     I'm resending this because although it doesn't seem to imply a
> hard disk failure, I have to repartition this disk and I must do it
> using a 2.6 kernel (long story), and I'm afraid that afterwards I
> cannot access the last sectors using 2.4 (since sometimes the disk is
> detected as being 2103 sectors smaller. I would appreciate any help,
> or if someone could point me to a source of information or a more
> appropriate mailing list.
> 
>     I'm having a problem with my primary hard disk: it inconsistently
> reports the number of addressable LBA sectors. At times it reports
> 156301488 (let's call it '301' from now on) which is the correct one
> (I think) and other times it reports 156299375 (I'll call this one
> 299 from now on), a difference of 2103 sectors. But this is not
> arbitrary, I have reproduced the problem. I've done it using a
> self-compiled 2.4.29 kernel and a 2.6.10-1-k7 kernel from Debian
> unstable. These are the steps:
> 
>     STEP 1: From a fully powered off machine, I boot into my 2.4.29
> kernel. The kernel log shows the 299 number, as well as does both
> hdparm -i and hdparm -I. No matter how many times I reboot these
> numbers maintain given I always reboot into 2.4.29.
> 
>     STEP 2: I reboot into my Debian system, using 2.6.10 kernel, and
> now kernel logs show 301 number, as does hdparm -I. But hdparm -i
> shows the 299 number.
> 
>     STEP 3: I reboot again into my Debian system. This time all
> places show the 301 number: the kernel logs, hdparm -i and -I.
> 
>     STEP 4: I reboot into my 2.4.19 kernel, and this time ALL places,
> again, show the 301 number. No matter how many times I reboot into
> 2.4.29 again or even 2.6 (Debian), these numbers doesn't change.
> 
>     I've done the same but starting from full power-off into Debian,
> and the things went like if we start from STEP 2 above. The only
> thing I've seen in the Debian logs that may explain this problem are:
> 
>     current capacity is 156299375
>     native capacity is 156301488

Hard drives have a feature that can reserve a certain amount of space 
away from the user.

Linux IDE often does 'set max' to make 100% of the hard drive visible to 
the OS.

	Jeff




  reply	other threads:[~2005-05-23 18:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-05-23 12:14 [RESEND] Hard disk LBA sector count is not always the same DervishD
2005-05-23 18:31 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2005-05-23 20:02   ` DervishD
2005-05-23 22:21     ` Petr Vandrovec
2005-05-24  7:14       ` DervishD

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=42922175.8090005@pobox.com \
    --to=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkml@dervishd.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox