Re: RT patch acceptance

Andrea Arcangeli
2005-06-01T15:38:52Z

On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 11:33:07AM -0400, Karim Yaghmour wrote:
> in a wider context of all the other statements within that claim, the main
> part being what I quoted earlier.

Ok great, I trust your patent knowledge given your background ;).

It's very reassuring that I was wrong and preempt-rt is not covered by
the patent. Until now I really understood that redefining an hard irq
disable to a soft irq disable was forbidden at large.