From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
To: Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@gmx.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SATA NCQ support
Date: Sun, 29 May 2005 12:36:04 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4299EF74.9060506@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050529131611.GB13418@merlin.emma.line.org>
Matthias Andree wrote:
> On Fri, 27 May 2005, Jens Axboe wrote:
>
>
>>>suck and should not be cared about, and if I were to go into SATA, I
>>>should just get a new controller and forget about my onboard VIA crap.
>>>(I read newer VIA are supposed to support AHCI which is good.)
>>
>>SATA is still pretty fast without NCQ, it just makes some operations a
>
>
> Do I take this as SATA is faster than legacy ATA? In what respect?
> UDMA/33 and SATA I shouldn't be much different if I use the same drive,
> or is there something?
It is "likely" to be faster. Faster bus, newer technology.
Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-29 16:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-05-27 7:03 [PATCH] SATA NCQ support Jens Axboe
2005-05-27 7:22 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-05-27 7:30 ` Jens Axboe
2005-05-27 7:37 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-05-27 7:47 ` Jens Axboe
2005-05-27 7:56 ` Jens Axboe
2005-05-27 8:24 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-05-27 8:27 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-05-27 8:28 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-05-27 8:35 ` Jens Axboe
2005-05-27 8:38 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-05-27 8:42 ` Jens Axboe
2005-05-27 23:47 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-05-27 13:18 ` Matthias Andree
2005-05-27 13:53 ` Jens Axboe
2005-05-27 14:46 ` Matthias Andree
2005-05-27 14:58 ` Jens Axboe
2005-05-29 13:16 ` Matthias Andree
2005-05-29 16:36 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2005-05-30 2:35 ` Eric D. Mudama
2005-05-30 3:41 ` Greg Stark
2005-05-30 4:04 ` Eric D. Mudama
2005-05-30 6:21 ` Greg Stark
2005-05-30 6:33 ` Jens Axboe
2005-05-30 12:16 ` Jens Axboe
2005-05-30 12:37 ` Jens Axboe
2005-05-30 14:51 ` Jens Axboe
2005-05-27 16:00 ` Jeff Garzik
[not found] <48Hix-88s-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <48N4N-4B5-25@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <48Pzt-6Kb-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
2005-05-31 0:00 ` Robert Hancock
2005-05-31 1:21 ` Jeff Garzik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4299EF74.9060506@pobox.com \
--to=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthias.andree@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox