Re: RT patch acceptance

john cooper
2005-05-24T16:31:49Z

Daniel Walker wrote:
> The main reason for my email is that I know Andrew and Linus don't want
> interrupts in threads. Without that there is no PREEMPT_RT . If you want
> to narrow the discussion to just interrupts in threads that's fine with
> me, cause that's what I'm concerned about.

Again, what are the technical arguments against scheduled
interrupts causing these folks concern? All in all it is
just a different locking paradigm where interrupt-initiated
scheduling is moved closer to the metal.

-john

--
john.cooper@timesys.com