public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bodo Stroesser <bstroesser@fujitsu-siemens.com>
To: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ulrich Weigand <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: Again: UML on s390 (31Bit)
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2005 12:50:30 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <429D92F6.90906@fujitsu-siemens.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <OFB257B050.D41F8BE1-ON41257012.005BE91F-41257012.005D25B2@de.ibm.com>

Thank You!
That's what we need.

	Bodo


Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
>>>I've prepared and attached a small program that easily can reproduce
>>>the problem. I hope this will help to find a viable solution.
>>
>>Here is a slightly modified version of my testtool. The new version
>>covers the fact, that in certain situations UML must avoid syscall
>>restarting, even if PSWADDR is not modified.
> 
> 
> Ok, Uli convinced me that the original patch to clear regs->traps if
> the system call has been canceled on the first call to syscall_trace
> is the correct thing to do. If the tracer chooses to invalidate the
> system call of the traced process then the complete handling of the
> function executed for the system call is done in the tracer. That
> includes system call restarting in the case that another system call
> is involved to implement the function. The point is that the traced
> process did not execute a system call, ergo no system call restarting
> may take place.
> So after a long discussion I'll just use a slightly modified version
> of the original patch:
> 
> Index: ptrace.c
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /home/cvs/linux-2.5/arch/s390/kernel/ptrace.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.35
> diff -u -r1.35 ptrace.c
> --- ptrace.c      6 May 2005 18:59:13 -0000     1.35
> +++ ptrace.c      31 May 2005 16:50:50 -0000
> @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
>  #include <asm/pgalloc.h>
>  #include <asm/system.h>
>  #include <asm/uaccess.h>
> +#include <asm/unistd.h>
> 
>  #ifdef CONFIG_S390_SUPPORT
>  #include "compat_ptrace.h"
> @@ -762,6 +763,13 @@
>             return;
>       ptrace_notify(SIGTRAP | ((current->ptrace & PT_TRACESYSGOOD)
>                          ? 0x80 : 0));
> +
> +     /*
> +      * If the debuffer has set an invalid system call number,
> +      * we prepare to skip the system call restart handling.
> +      */
> +     if (!entryexit && regs->gprs[2] >= NR_syscalls)
> +           regs->trap = -1;
> 
>       /*
>        * this isn't the same as continuing with a signal, but it will do
> 
> ===================================================================
> 
> regs->trap should be reset for any invalid system call, not just for
> negative system call numbers.
> 
> blue skies,
>    Martin
> 
> Martin Schwidefsky
> Linux for zSeries Development & Services
> IBM Deutschland Entwicklung GmbH
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2005-06-01 10:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-05-04 21:33 Again: UML on s390 (31Bit) Ulrich Weigand
2005-05-06 13:04 ` Bodo Stroesser
2005-05-13 15:07   ` Bodo Stroesser
2005-05-13 15:26     ` Martin Schwidefsky
2005-05-13 15:37       ` Bodo Stroesser
2005-05-13 15:40         ` Martin Schwidefsky
2005-05-13 15:45           ` Bodo Stroesser
2005-05-13 15:50             ` Martin Schwidefsky
2005-05-13 16:06               ` Bodo Stroesser
2005-05-20 10:09     ` Bodo Stroesser
2005-05-31 16:57       ` Martin Schwidefsky
2005-06-01 10:50         ` Bodo Stroesser [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-05-04 16:04 Martin Schwidefsky
2005-05-04 19:02 ` Bodo Stroesser
2005-04-27 20:21 Bodo Stroesser
2005-04-28  8:36 ` Martin Schwidefsky
2005-04-28  9:54   ` Bodo Stroesser
2005-04-28 13:03     ` Martin Schwidefsky
2005-04-28 13:41       ` Bodo Stroesser
2005-04-28 15:27         ` Martin Schwidefsky
2005-04-28 18:50           ` Bodo Stroesser
2005-04-29 11:47             ` Martin Schwidefsky
2005-04-29 12:47               ` Bodo Stroesser

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=429D92F6.90906@fujitsu-siemens.com \
    --to=bstroesser@fujitsu-siemens.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=uweigand@de.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox