Re: RT patch acceptance

Nick Piggin
2005-05-31T01:22:50Z

Bill Huey (hui) wrote:
> On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 12:21:20AM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:

>
>>And my questions for which I got no answer were things like
>>"why is a single kernel superior to a nanokernel for hard-RT?",
>>"what deterministic services would a hard-RT Linux need to provide?"
>
>
> That's an RT begineer's question. You have to at least be up to speed
> in that one to have the conversation at hand and folks have discussed
> this repeatedly. It's not our end that failing and clearly you not
> understanding this only reenforces this point..
>

Bill, you can belittle me to your heart's content. It really
doesn't bother me in the slightest.

Whenever you or anyone else try to complicate the Linux kernel
with hard-RT stuff, I'm going to ask exactly the same questions
because I don't think you know how a nanokernel solution would
work, or even what kind of services a hard-RT Linux would need
to provide.

Send instant messages to your online friends http://au.messenger.yahoo.com