From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261496AbVFARiB (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Jun 2005 13:38:01 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261498AbVFARfU (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Jun 2005 13:35:20 -0400 Received: from 1-1-10-11a.has.sth.bostream.se ([82.182.131.18]:32216 "EHLO DeepSpaceNine.stesmi.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261485AbVFARdO (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Jun 2005 13:33:14 -0400 Message-ID: <429DF248.3080906@stesmi.com> Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2005 19:37:12 +0200 From: Stefan Smietanowski User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lukasz Stelmach CC: LKML Subject: Re: [OT] mailing list management References: <429D8A3A.8000304@poczta.fm> <20050601102211.GR2417@lug-owl.de> <429D8E96.4010908@poczta.fm> <1117622754.6885.31.camel@tara.firmix.at> <429D95AB.1070909@poczta.fm> In-Reply-To: <429D95AB.1070909@poczta.fm> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.91.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-AntiVirus: checked by Vexira Milter 1.0.7; VAE 6.29.0.5; VDF 6.29.0.100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Lukasz Stelmach wrote: > Bernd Petrovitsch napisał(a): > [...] > >>>I would even suggest placing real name in the reply to field next to >>>list's address. >> >>Sorry, but the writing the original senders name with the lists address >>into any header field is insane and totally unacceptable. > > > OK. I understand your and other's point of view. I just wanted to ask if > this is not a good idea. You say no, I accept it. > > These ideas make the mailing list resemble behavior of FidoNet echos and > GoldEd which were my first contact with e-mail conferences and I used to > like the way they worked. But that is completly different story. > You're also missing another point. If someone sends a mail to the list without being subscribed to it, and then you would write only to the list, the person asking the original question wouldn't get the answer. In a small, closed list reply-to: set to the list is good, but not on an open list with people not subscribed answer. // Stefan -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32) iD8DBQFCnfJIBrn2kJu9P78RAqvdAJ4hytAAYiIS3Bg2b8/4dcW7cz074QCcDIQD MmodL/gDdpxXca/+6E1sqpY= =066Y -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----