From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261339AbVFBJqA (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Jun 2005 05:46:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261343AbVFBJqA (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Jun 2005 05:46:00 -0400 Received: from smtp2.poczta.interia.pl ([213.25.80.232]:13401 "EHLO smtp.poczta.interia.pl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261339AbVFBJpt (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Jun 2005 05:45:49 -0400 Message-ID: <429ED547.3030506@poczta.fm> Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 11:45:43 +0200 From: Lukasz Stelmach User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041206) X-Accept-Language: pl, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stefan Smietanowski Cc: LKML Subject: Re: [OT] mailing list management References: <429D8A3A.8000304@poczta.fm> <20050601102211.GR2417@lug-owl.de> <429D8E96.4010908@poczta.fm> <1117622754.6885.31.camel@tara.firmix.at> <429D95AB.1070909@poczta.fm> <429DF248.3080906@stesmi.com> In-Reply-To: <429DF248.3080906@stesmi.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.1.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig0BE018B6CC1886D41FA7CD2B" X-EMID: fac60138 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig0BE018B6CC1886D41FA7CD2B Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Stefan Smietanowski napisa=B3(a): >>>These ideas make the mailing list resemble behavior of FidoNet echos a= nd >>>GoldEd which were my first contact with e-mail conferences and I used = to >>>like the way they worked. But that is completly different story. >>> >=20 >=20 > You're also missing another point. >=20 > If someone sends a mail to the list without being subscribed to it, > and then you would write only to the list, the person asking the > original question wouldn't get the answer. Explicit CC request + self-CC the e-mail sent to the list in most cases will suffice. As far as TB is concerned this also needs 'Reply All' to be used but self-cc seems to me semantically more logical. Especially in the case Jasper has given when he sends a mail to LKML from a different place (work) than he receives it. > In a small, closed list reply-to: set to the list is good, but not on > an open list with people not subscribed answer. I may agree that. What I am really against is the dogmathic point of view presented in the document about RT header that is linked from the FAQ. --=20 By=B3o mi bardzo mi=B3o. Trzecia pospolita kl=EAska, [= =2E..] >=A3ukasz< Ju=BF nie katolicka lecz z=B3odziejska. = (c)PP --------------enig0BE018B6CC1886D41FA7CD2B Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCntVHNdzY8sm9K9wRAmFnAJ9SwBwA/oo+AHRF9dE4y3veFRz4UgCaA7yh F9EiHkxSYymQSZGl+o/KJ0c= =tvCa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig0BE018B6CC1886D41FA7CD2B--