From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261361AbVFBKF2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Jun 2005 06:05:28 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261363AbVFBKF1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Jun 2005 06:05:27 -0400 Received: from smtp2.poczta.interia.pl ([213.25.80.232]:15740 "EHLO smtp.poczta.interia.pl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261361AbVFBKFP (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Jun 2005 06:05:15 -0400 Message-ID: <429ED9CD.9000100@poczta.fm> Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 12:05:01 +0200 From: Lukasz Stelmach User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041206) X-Accept-Language: pl, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: paul@clubi.ie, Linux Kernel Subject: Re: [OT] mailing list management References: <429D8A3A.8000304@poczta.fm> <20050601102211.GR2417@lug-owl.de> <429D8E96.4010908@poczta.fm> <429DADAC.7070207@poczta.fm> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.1.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigAB022F781AB64C395D1965DB" X-EMID: 84fc6138 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigAB022F781AB64C395D1965DB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Paul Jakma napisa=C5=82(a): > On Wed, 1 Jun 2005, Lukasz Stelmach wrote: >=20 >> I prefere, and I do it, explicit asking for a CC. >=20 >=20 > No need - set a Reply-To to point back at the list. >=20 > Reply-To isn't ideal, primarily because of dumb MUAs, but it works. > There ought to be a better way to indicate this preference, but there > isn't unfortunately. CC is muc better From: someone@unsubscribed To: mailing-list CC: someone@unsubscribed Reply-To: mailing-list From: someone@subscribed To: mailing-list CC: someone@subscribed.that.wants.a.personal.copy.of.replies Reply-To: mailing-list From: someone@subscribed To: mailing-list Reply-To: mailing-list When we use Reply All to answer all of this messages we get quit a senisble behavior. Far more sensible than answering to the list and personally to everyone. >> And direct replying generates more traffic. >=20 > ROFL. Direct replies are miniscule compared to regular list traffic > which itself is less than the traffic generated by spam. Does it mean that we shoudn't try conserve the bandwidth just because there is spam? --=20 By=C5=82o mi bardzo mi=C5=82o. Trzecia pospolita kl=C4= =99ska, [...] >=C5=81ukasz< Ju=C5=BC nie katolicka lecz z=C5=82odz= iejska. (c)PP --------------enigAB022F781AB64C395D1965DB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCntnVNdzY8sm9K9wRAt/MAJ44n4vo9hOfEdFlnHrhBcjOhqNUSACgmMXF l0ubolk2ozJysccFlLIZviA= =TTcc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigAB022F781AB64C395D1965DB--