From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261189AbVFBQWV (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Jun 2005 12:22:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261187AbVFBQWU (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Jun 2005 12:22:20 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:14209 "EHLO mx2.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261182AbVFBQWF (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Jun 2005 12:22:05 -0400 Message-ID: <429F321D.9000009@suse.de> Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 18:21:49 +0200 From: Stefan Seyfried User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041207 Thunderbird/1.0 Mnenhy/0.7.2.0 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pavel Machek Cc: Linux-pm mailing list , Linux Kernel list , Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: [RFC] Add some hooks to generic suspend code References: <1117524577.5826.35.camel@gaston> <20050531101344.GB9614@elf.ucw.cz> <1117550660.5826.42.camel@gaston> <20050531212556.GA14968@elf.ucw.cz> In-Reply-To: <20050531212556.GA14968@elf.ucw.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Pavel Machek wrote: > Anyway, it should not be arch-dependend. We need one good mechanism of > notifying userland, not one per architecture. Yes. >> Sure, ideally. However, existing X knows how to deal with APM events, >> and thus APM emulation is an important thing to get something that >> works. Pne thing I should do is consolidate PPC APM emu with ARM one as >> I think Russell improve my stuff significantly. > > Perhaps we need apm emulation on i386, too? No. This is too ugly for words IMO. If we have one good mechanism of notifying userland, X can use this mechanism. Let's kill APM, not keep it alive. -- Stefan Seyfried QA / R&D Team Mobile Devices | "Any ideas, John?" SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Nürnberg | "Well, surrounding them's out."