From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
To: Michael Thonke <iogl64nx@gmail.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Pentium-D support
Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2005 13:45:43 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <42A5DD47.5090000@tmr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42A5C8A3.2090202@gmail.com>
Michael Thonke wrote:
> Bill Davidsen schrieb:
>
>
>>Since this is really a question in several areas I'll put it here. Now
>>that the Pentium-D processors are available at reasonable prices and
>>for quick delivery, can anyone speak to the ACPI issues? The available
>>boards use the 945 and 955 chipset. Is there any reason to think that
>>the scheduler would get confused by the CPU, such as thinking it was
>>HT or some such?
>
>
> There are only issues with CPUFREQ/speedstep and some ACPI related
> things on Intel 955X chipset I have. So I use a ASUS P5WD2-Premium.
> The Pentium D will reach me in few days so I only guess and I think the
> kernel know how to handle Physical Cores and SMT/HT Processors.
>
>
>>The specs indicate that 64 bit is supported, is there any actualy
>>Linux support for the Intel 64 bit stuff in gcc and the kernel? One of
>>the people I work with reports that the distro he runs on his Athlon64
>>lock solid after reading the boot sector, so obviously this isn't
>>Athlon compatable.
>>
>
> Yes the 64bit support of the Intel CPUs are well supported, I use a
> Intel Pentium 4 640 and 64bit compiled system (Gentoo 2005)
> I have no problems everything is working nearly perfect better as my
> AMD64 system.
>
> For GCC 3.4.x or 4.0.x you only need the compile switch -march=nocona as
> the name of the XEON..but its the same piece of technologie
Okay, unless I can find an Intel-64 build of Fedora I'll have to do it
myself, but now that I know what option to use it's possible. Trust
Intel to have a 64 bit standard which isn't Itanium and isn't ..quite..
AMD compatible.
>
>
>>The price is lower than a dual Xeon setup if you have an application
>>which needs SMP, and initial power values make it look like a lower
>>power solution overall.
>
>
> Cheep and good performance.
Thanks for the pointer!
--
-bill davidsen (davidsen@tmr.com)
"The secret to procrastination is to put things off until the
last possible moment - but no longer" -me
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-06-07 17:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-06-07 15:06 Pentium-D support Bill Davidsen
2005-06-07 16:17 ` Michael Thonke
2005-06-07 17:45 ` Bill Davidsen [this message]
2005-06-07 18:18 ` Dave Jones
2005-06-07 18:27 ` Lennart Sorensen
2005-06-07 17:50 ` Siddha, Suresh B
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=42A5DD47.5090000@tmr.com \
--to=davidsen@tmr.com \
--cc=iogl64nx@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox