From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262446AbVFIXum (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jun 2005 19:50:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262505AbVFIXug (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jun 2005 19:50:36 -0400 Received: from gateway-1237.mvista.com ([12.44.186.158]:42233 "EHLO av.mvista.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262446AbVFIXsu (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Jun 2005 19:48:50 -0400 Message-ID: <42A8D52C.701@mvista.com> Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2005 16:47:56 -0700 From: George Anzinger Reply-To: george@mvista.com Organization: MontaVista Software User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.6) Gecko/20050323 Fedora/1.7.6-1.3.2 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Roman Zippel CC: Pavel Fedin , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Full NLS support for HFS (classic) filesystem References: <429B1E35.2040905@rambler.ru> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Roman Zippel wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, 30 May 2005, Pavel Fedin wrote: > > > (BTW please try to inline the patch otherwise it's rather difficult to > quote from it.) I, for one, fine the attachment better. Especially as he has a signature mark at the end of his comments. On my mailer (Mozilla) the attachment is inlined after the message and comes up in the reply window. If it is inlined after the signature mark it is both half bright in the original message and does NOT come up in the reply. So confusing as to how and which mailer to use... -- George Anzinger george@mvista.com HRT (High-res-timers): http://sourceforge.net/projects/high-res-timers/