From: Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, Linas Vepstas <linas@austin.ibm.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
long <tlnguyen@snoqualmie.dp.intel.com>,
linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz,
linuxppc64-dev <linuxppc64-dev@ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10] IOCHK interface for I/O error handling/detecting
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 19:31:14 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <42A96BF2.7070203@jp.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050609165719.GC9597@kroah.com>
Greg KH wrote:
>> /* definition of ia64 iocookie */
>>-typedef unsigned long iocookie;
>>+struct __iocookie {
>>+ struct list_head list;
>>+ struct pci_dev *dev; /* targeting device */
>>+ unsigned long error; /* error flag */
>>+};
>>+typedef struct __iocookie iocookie;
>
> Hm, why not just make the thing be a "struct iocookie" in the first
> place, then we don't have to mess with a typedef at all. And then each
> arch can define how the structure will look like in their private .c
> files, ensuring that no user can ever try to touch the structure
> themselves.
Aha.., maybe I understand it just now.
I don't know why, but I just stuck to typedef...
Thanks,
H.Seto
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-06-10 10:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-06-09 12:39 [PATCH 00/10] IOCHK interface for I/O error handling/detecting Hidetoshi Seto
2005-06-09 12:48 ` [PATCH 01/10] " Hidetoshi Seto
2005-06-09 16:53 ` Greg KH
2005-06-10 10:29 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2005-06-09 12:50 ` [PATCH 02/10] " Hidetoshi Seto
2005-06-09 12:51 ` [PATCH 03/10] " Hidetoshi Seto
2005-06-09 16:57 ` Greg KH
2005-06-10 10:31 ` Hidetoshi Seto [this message]
2005-06-09 17:20 ` Matthew Wilcox
2005-06-10 10:31 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2005-06-09 12:53 ` [PATCH 04/10] " Hidetoshi Seto
2005-06-09 16:57 ` Greg KH
2005-06-09 12:54 ` [PATCH 05/10] " Hidetoshi Seto
2005-06-09 12:56 ` [PATCH 06/10] " Hidetoshi Seto
2005-06-09 12:58 ` [PATCH 07/10] " Hidetoshi Seto
2005-06-09 17:40 ` David Mosberger
2005-06-10 10:29 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2005-06-10 17:25 ` David Mosberger
2005-06-13 6:54 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2005-06-09 13:00 ` [PATCH 08/10] " Hidetoshi Seto
2005-06-09 13:02 ` [PATCH 09/10] " Hidetoshi Seto
2005-06-09 13:04 ` [PATCH 10/10] " Hidetoshi Seto
2005-06-09 16:59 ` [PATCH 00/10] " Greg KH
2005-06-09 17:13 ` Matthew Wilcox
2005-06-09 22:26 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2005-06-10 10:31 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2005-06-10 10:30 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2005-06-09 17:34 ` Matthew Wilcox
2005-06-10 10:32 ` Hidetoshi Seto
2005-06-10 23:25 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=42A96BF2.7070203@jp.fujitsu.com \
--to=seto.hidetoshi@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linas@austin.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
--cc=linuxppc64-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=tlnguyen@snoqualmie.dp.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox