From: Alastair Poole <alastair@unixtrix.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: BUG: Major TCP connect() errors, don't release as stable.
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 14:16:32 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <42A9A0C0.5030802@unixtrix.com> (raw)
I have tested various kernels including 2.6.11.10 2.6.11.11 and
2.6.12-rc6 and am having unusual results regarding connect(). Earlier
kernels do not return the same strange results.
I have tested numerous basic port scanners, including my own, and
strangely ports which are NOT open are being reported as open. I have
checked these ports by various means -- to be certain they are NOT open
-- and in various runlevels; the results are the same. There are no TCP
daemons running, nor RPC services. This is definately kerenl related.
The number of ports listed changes in size and they appear to be
random. For example, on one scan ports 22, 3455, 4532 and 6236 will
appear open; on another scan it might be 22, 3567, 3879, 3889, 6589 and
7374.
However, ports which ARE open do also appear as open alongside these
"rogue" ports. I have also tested this on another system with the same
results. It is also interesting to note that a basic TCP nmap scan of
all ports does not return these unusual results.
I was initially told that the problem was not kernel related. However,
I have now reconfirmed with three seperate sources. This is, indeed,
quite a serious kernel related bug. Please take this seriously.
Enclosed is example code that produces these results on the named
kernels and systems.
sincerely
Alastair Poole
########################################################################
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <errno.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/socket.h>
#include <netinet/in.h>
#include <arpa/inet.h>
#include <netdb.h>
#include <time.h>
#include <string.h>
int
main (int argc, char **argv)
{
int sd, result, server_port;
*struct* hostent *he;
*struct* sockaddr_in servaddr;
printf ("Test TCP/IP port scanner:\n");
*if* (argc != 2)
{
printf ("Usage: %s host\n", argv[0]);
exit (1);
}
*if* ((he = gethostbyname (argv[1])) == NULL)
{
perror ("gethostbyname()");
exit (1);
}
printf ("Scanning %s\n", argv[1]);
*for* (server_port = 0; server_port < 65536; server_port++)
{
*if* ((sd = socket (PF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_TCP)) == -1)
{
perror ("socket()");
exit (1);
}
bzero (&servaddr, *sizeof* servaddr);
servaddr.sin_family = AF_INET;
servaddr.sin_port = htons (server_port);
servaddr.sin_addr = *((*struct* in_addr *) he->h_addr);
result = connect (sd, (*struct* sockaddr *) &servaddr, *sizeof*
servaddr);
*if* (result != -1)
{
printf ("open port: %d\n",server_port);
}
close (sd);
}
*return* result;
}
########################################################################
next reply other threads:[~2005-06-10 13:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-06-10 14:16 Alastair Poole [this message]
2005-06-10 17:44 ` BUG: Major TCP connect() errors, don't release as stable Stephen Hemminger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=42A9A0C0.5030802@unixtrix.com \
--to=alastair@unixtrix.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox