public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ondrej Zary <linux@rainbow-software.org>
To: Grant Coady <grant_lkml@dodo.com.au>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Odd IDE performance drop 2.4 vs 2.6?
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 12:43:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <42AD6362.1000109@rainbow-software.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ac0qa19omlt7bsh8mcfsfr2uhshk338f0c@4ax.com>

Grant Coady wrote:
> Hi there,
> 
> A new 'old' box, with near 3:1 hdparm -Tt /dev/hda performance drop 
> comparing 2.4.31 with 2.6.11.12. pII/266 on 440LX chipset. HDD set 
> to udma2 (max for h/w) with manuf. utility.  Single master on ribbon.
> CDROM on other ribbon.  Two runs each via ssh login soon after boot:

I see this problem too with i430TX chipset (the south bridge and thus 
IDE controller is the same as in i440LX/EX and BX/ZX).

2.6.12-rc5:
/dev/hda:
  Timing cached reads:   180 MB in  2.02 seconds =  89.11 MB/sec
  Timing buffered disk reads:   40 MB in  3.09 seconds =  12.94 MB/sec

2.4.31:
/dev/hda:
  Timing cached reads:   180 MB in  2.03 seconds =  88.67 MB/sec
  Timing buffered disk reads:   62 MB in  3.01 seconds =  20.60 MB/sec

I also noticed that during the buffered read test on 2.6 kernel, the IDE 
activity LED is blinking (so the drive is not 100% utilised) while it's 
permanently on with 2.4.

> Linux 2.4.31-si.
> root@silly:~# hdparm -tT /dev/hda
> 
> /dev/hda:
>  Timing cached reads:   344 MB in  1.99 seconds = 172.86 MB/sec
>  Timing buffered disk reads:   68 MB in  3.02 seconds =  22.52 MB/sec
> root@silly:~# hdparm -tT /dev/hda
> 
> /dev/hda:
>  Timing cached reads:   356 MB in  2.00 seconds = 178.00 MB/sec
>  Timing buffered disk reads:   68 MB in  3.04 seconds =  22.37 MB/sec
> root@silly:~#
> 
> Linux 2.6.11.12a.
> root@silly:~# hdparm -tT /dev/hda
> 
> /dev/hda:
>  Timing cached reads:   340 MB in  2.01 seconds = 168.76 MB/sec
>  Timing buffered disk reads:   26 MB in  3.02 seconds =   8.60 MB/sec
> root@silly:~# hdparm -tT /dev/hda
> 
> /dev/hda:
>  Timing cached reads:   340 MB in  2.01 seconds = 169.26 MB/sec
>  Timing buffered disk reads:   26 MB in  3.02 seconds =   8.61 MB/sec
> root@silly:~#
> 
> Hardware info, configs, etc at http://scatter.mine.nu/test/boxen/silly/
> --Grant.
> 

-- 
Ondrej Zary

  reply	other threads:[~2005-06-13 10:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-06-13  4:03 Odd IDE performance drop 2.4 vs 2.6? Grant Coady
2005-06-13 10:43 ` Ondrej Zary [this message]
2005-06-13 13:39   ` Alan Cox
2005-06-13 14:06     ` Nick Piggin
2005-06-13 15:09       ` Alan Cox
2005-06-13 17:01         ` Ondrej Zary
2005-06-13 20:25         ` Jens Axboe
2005-06-14  2:20         ` Nick Piggin
2005-06-15 19:15         ` Ondrej Zary
2005-06-17 12:40           ` Alan Cox
2005-06-17 13:43             ` Ondrej Zary
2005-06-13 18:13     ` Grant Coady

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=42AD6362.1000109@rainbow-software.org \
    --to=linux@rainbow-software.org \
    --cc=grant_lkml@dodo.com.au \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox