From: Ondrej Zary <linux@rainbow-software.org>
To: Grant Coady <grant_lkml@dodo.com.au>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Odd IDE performance drop 2.4 vs 2.6?
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 12:43:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <42AD6362.1000109@rainbow-software.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ac0qa19omlt7bsh8mcfsfr2uhshk338f0c@4ax.com>
Grant Coady wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> A new 'old' box, with near 3:1 hdparm -Tt /dev/hda performance drop
> comparing 2.4.31 with 2.6.11.12. pII/266 on 440LX chipset. HDD set
> to udma2 (max for h/w) with manuf. utility. Single master on ribbon.
> CDROM on other ribbon. Two runs each via ssh login soon after boot:
I see this problem too with i430TX chipset (the south bridge and thus
IDE controller is the same as in i440LX/EX and BX/ZX).
2.6.12-rc5:
/dev/hda:
Timing cached reads: 180 MB in 2.02 seconds = 89.11 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 40 MB in 3.09 seconds = 12.94 MB/sec
2.4.31:
/dev/hda:
Timing cached reads: 180 MB in 2.03 seconds = 88.67 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 62 MB in 3.01 seconds = 20.60 MB/sec
I also noticed that during the buffered read test on 2.6 kernel, the IDE
activity LED is blinking (so the drive is not 100% utilised) while it's
permanently on with 2.4.
> Linux 2.4.31-si.
> root@silly:~# hdparm -tT /dev/hda
>
> /dev/hda:
> Timing cached reads: 344 MB in 1.99 seconds = 172.86 MB/sec
> Timing buffered disk reads: 68 MB in 3.02 seconds = 22.52 MB/sec
> root@silly:~# hdparm -tT /dev/hda
>
> /dev/hda:
> Timing cached reads: 356 MB in 2.00 seconds = 178.00 MB/sec
> Timing buffered disk reads: 68 MB in 3.04 seconds = 22.37 MB/sec
> root@silly:~#
>
> Linux 2.6.11.12a.
> root@silly:~# hdparm -tT /dev/hda
>
> /dev/hda:
> Timing cached reads: 340 MB in 2.01 seconds = 168.76 MB/sec
> Timing buffered disk reads: 26 MB in 3.02 seconds = 8.60 MB/sec
> root@silly:~# hdparm -tT /dev/hda
>
> /dev/hda:
> Timing cached reads: 340 MB in 2.01 seconds = 169.26 MB/sec
> Timing buffered disk reads: 26 MB in 3.02 seconds = 8.61 MB/sec
> root@silly:~#
>
> Hardware info, configs, etc at http://scatter.mine.nu/test/boxen/silly/
> --Grant.
>
--
Ondrej Zary
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-06-13 10:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-06-13 4:03 Odd IDE performance drop 2.4 vs 2.6? Grant Coady
2005-06-13 10:43 ` Ondrej Zary [this message]
2005-06-13 13:39 ` Alan Cox
2005-06-13 14:06 ` Nick Piggin
2005-06-13 15:09 ` Alan Cox
2005-06-13 17:01 ` Ondrej Zary
2005-06-13 20:25 ` Jens Axboe
2005-06-14 2:20 ` Nick Piggin
2005-06-15 19:15 ` Ondrej Zary
2005-06-17 12:40 ` Alan Cox
2005-06-17 13:43 ` Ondrej Zary
2005-06-13 18:13 ` Grant Coady
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=42AD6362.1000109@rainbow-software.org \
--to=linux@rainbow-software.org \
--cc=grant_lkml@dodo.com.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox