From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261671AbVFMQfR (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Jun 2005 12:35:17 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261791AbVFMQfR (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Jun 2005 12:35:17 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:19913 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261671AbVFMQfH (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Jun 2005 12:35:07 -0400 Message-ID: <42ADB4E4.2010504@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 09:31:32 -0700 From: Ulrich Drepper Organization: Red Hat, Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2-6 (X11/20050513) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Woodhouse CC: Jakub Jelinek , Linus Torvalds , Linux Kernel Mailing List , akpm@osdl.org Subject: Re: Add pselect, ppoll system calls. References: <1118444314.4823.81.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1118616499.9949.103.camel@localhost.localdomain> <42AD2640.5040601@redhat.com> <20050613091600.GA32364@outpost.ds9a.nl> <1118655702.2840.24.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050613110556.GA26039@infradead.org> <20050613111422.GT22349@devserv.devel.redhat.com> <1118661848.2840.34.camel@localhost.localdomain> <42ADA880.60303@redhat.com> <1118678548.25956.200.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com> <42ADAFE5.5050206@redhat.com> <1118680177.25956.213.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1118680177.25956.213.camel@hades.cambridge.redhat.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.91.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig2A6CA12B629D9BB85D7C015F" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig2A6CA12B629D9BB85D7C015F Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable David Woodhouse wrote: > Yes, we should make the time for ppoll() a 64-bit value, so you can > request a time period longer than 24 days. Shall we also switch to > microseconds? I don't see the need for higher precision in this API and a change is confusing. There is nanosleep() for people who only want a delay and that can be done with high precision. --=20 =E2=9E=A7 Ulrich Drepper =E2=9E=A7 Red Hat, Inc. =E2=9E=A7 444 Castro St = =E2=9E=A7 Mountain View, CA =E2=9D=96 --------------enig2A6CA12B629D9BB85D7C015F Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCrbTk2ijCOnn/RHQRAu/VAKCoRgqfqLFk2FhQCcxwxOQanCY3DQCfTJM9 Wf4w43OhF8gBqZqAz5i79yY= =idQw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig2A6CA12B629D9BB85D7C015F--