From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261436AbVFMWFn (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Jun 2005 18:05:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261493AbVFMWEu (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Jun 2005 18:04:50 -0400 Received: from opersys.com ([64.40.108.71]:53773 "EHLO www.opersys.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261436AbVFMWBp (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Jun 2005 18:01:45 -0400 Message-ID: <42AE04AE.8070107@opersys.com> Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 18:11:58 -0400 From: Karim Yaghmour Reply-To: karim@opersys.com Organization: Opersys inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040805 Netscape/7.2 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, fr, fr-be, fr-ca, fr-fr MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dwalker@mvista.com CC: paulmck@us.ibm.com, Andrea Arcangeli , Bill Huey , Lee Revell , Tim Bird , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@elte.hu, pmarques@grupopie.com, bruce@andrew.cmu.edu, nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, ak@muc.de, sdietrich@mvista.com, hch@infradead.org, akpm@osdl.org Subject: Re: Attempted summary of "RT patch acceptance" thread References: <20050610223724.GA20853@nietzsche.lynx.com> <20050610225231.GF6564@g5.random> <20050610230836.GD21618@nietzsche.lynx.com> <20050610232955.GH6564@g5.random> <20050611014133.GO1300@us.ibm.com> <20050611155459.GB5796@g5.random> <20050611210417.GC1299@us.ibm.com> <42AB7857.1090907@opersys.com> <20050612214519.GB1340@us.ibm.com> <42ACE2D3.9080106@opersys.com> <20050613144022.GA1305@us.ibm.com> <42ADE334.4030002@opersys.com> <1118693033.2725.21.camel@dhcp153.mvista.com> <42ADEC0E.4020907@opersys.com> <1118694495.2725.32.camel@dhcp153.mvista.com> <42AE01EA.10905@opersys.com> In-Reply-To: <42AE01EA.10905@opersys.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Karim Yaghmour wrote: > I'm not suggesting the separation of the community, I'm suggesting BTW, though I repeat that this wasn't what I was suggesting, it can be easily argued that community separation already exists. The fact of the matter is that few mainstream developers have been "asking" for RT. And at this point, some seem genuinely worried about its possible integration. So one can keep ignoring the reality of the existing clash here, but it may just be that backing off a little and thinking about it in less absolute integration terms would help. Karim -- Author, Speaker, Developer, Consultant Pushing Embedded and Real-Time Linux Systems Beyond the Limits http://www.opersys.com || karim@opersys.com || 1-866-677-4546