public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steve Lord <lord@xfs.org>
To: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@sgi.com>
Cc: "K.R. Foley" <kr@cybsft.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	pozsy@uhulinux.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	rusty@rustcorp.com.au
Subject: Re: Race condition in module load causing undefined symbols
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 14:27:29 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <42AF2FA1.7080403@xfs.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42AF2088.3090605@sgi.com>

Thanks Prarit,

I updated mkinitrd from 4.1.18 to 4.2.15 and udev from 039 to 058.
This appears to have cured it on my work machine, I will try the
other box later.

Looking at Documentation/Changes, which appears to still be the
official repository for required tool versions, it seems somewhat
dated, and makes no mention of mkinitrd version requirements.

Steve

Prarit Bhargava wrote:
> Colleagues,
> 
> (Copied and edited from a post I made on linux-hotplug-devel last month.)
> 
> I've privately emailed Steve with a quick-and-dirty solution for the 
> problems he was experiencing with the system boot.  I wasn't sure if he 
> was having the same problems I've had with 2.6.12 and old packages but 
> it looks like he was.
> 
> I'm surprised we haven't had more people on this list wondering about 
> the strange behaviour of their initrd/initramfs :) .
> 
> When I looked at the original output Steve had posted I noticed that it 
> looked like drivers were attempting to load at the same time and because 
> of this he eventually hit an oops.  I (and an engineer from another 
> company working on another arch) have hit the same problem due to the 
> requirements of our current work.
> 
> (Unfortunately, I'm more familiar with RedHat/Fedora than I am with 
> other distro's -- please bear with me.)
> 
> The issue is that David Howells posted a patch that changed the 
> behaviour of kallsyms/insmod/rmmod sometime ago.  The patch *is correct* 
> in what it does, however, the patch requires that /sbin/sh must be aware 
> of pid returns by wait().
> 
>     http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/1/17/132
> 
> There are two fixes that I'm aware of, and depending on what you're 
> doing they are both "correct" (although in the case of developing in 
> 2.6.12, IMO, you
> _must_ do the latter).
> 
> The first fix is for the situation where you're developing for a 
> specific distribution.  If this is the case, then you should back out 
> the patch above and continue moving forward.
> 
> The second fix, and again you must do this if you're developing 2.6.12, 
> is to *update the mkinitrd package* which has a new version of /bin/sh.
> 
> P.
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2005-06-14 19:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-06-10 14:03 Race condition in module load causing undefined symbols Stephen Lord
2005-06-10 18:25 ` Andrew Morton
2005-06-10 19:06   ` Steve Lord
2005-06-11  3:30   ` Stephen Lord
2005-06-11  8:26   ` Pozsár Balázs
2005-06-11 13:23     ` Steve Lord
2005-06-11 15:05       ` Pozsár Balázs
2005-06-11 17:56         ` Stephen Lord
2005-06-11 19:00           ` Andrew Morton
2005-06-11 19:08             ` Pozsár Balázs
2005-06-11 20:09             ` Steve Lord
2005-06-11 20:18               ` Pozsár Balázs
2005-06-14 13:34             ` Steve Lord
2005-06-14 15:33               ` K.R. Foley
2005-06-14 15:36               ` K.R. Foley
2005-06-14 16:38                 ` Steve Lord
2005-06-14 16:56                   ` Andi Kleen
2005-06-14 17:16                     ` Steve Lord
2005-06-14 20:56                     ` Pozsár Balázs
2005-06-14 17:10                   ` K.R. Foley
2005-06-14 17:39                     ` Steve Lord
2005-06-14 18:23                       ` Prarit Bhargava
2005-06-14 19:27                         ` Steve Lord [this message]
2005-06-14 19:32                           ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-06-14 20:59                         ` Pozsár Balázs
2005-06-15 11:28                           ` Prarit Bhargava
2005-06-15 11:34                             ` Pozsár Balázs
2005-06-15 11:35                               ` Prarit Bhargava
2005-06-15 11:43                                 ` Pozsár Balázs
2005-06-15 12:33                             ` Stephen Lord
2005-07-28 19:42                               ` David Howells
2005-06-12  6:49 ` Rusty Russell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=42AF2FA1.7080403@xfs.org \
    --to=lord@xfs.org \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=kr@cybsft.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pozsy@uhulinux.hu \
    --cc=prarit@sgi.com \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox