From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261733AbVFPEW5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Jun 2005 00:22:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261734AbVFPEW5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Jun 2005 00:22:57 -0400 Received: from zcars04e.nortelnetworks.com ([47.129.242.56]:21489 "EHLO zcars04e.ca.nortel.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261733AbVFPEW4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Jun 2005 00:22:56 -0400 Message-ID: <42B0FE88.1070404@nortel.com> Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 22:22:32 -0600 X-Sybari-Space: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 From: Chris Friesen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040115 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Todd Kneisel CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC/Patch] robust futexes for 2.6.12-rc6 References: <42B0B5FD.3010309@bull.com> In-Reply-To: <42B0B5FD.3010309@bull.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Todd Kneisel wrote: > This patch adds robust futex support to the existing sys_futex system call. > The patch applies to 2.6.12-rc6. I have tested this code on an IA64 SMP > system. Any comments or discussion will be welcome. How does this compare to the robust mutexes portion of the stuff that Inaky was working on? Chris