From: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
To: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Cc: axboe@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH Linux 2.6.12-rc6-mm1 00/06] blk: generic dispatch queue (for review)
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 15:19:35 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <42B119F7.6000709@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050616045540.E3E4D48B@htj.dyndns.org>
Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Jens.
>
> This patchset implements generic dispatch queue I've talked about in
> the last ordered reimplementation patchset. The patches are against
> 2.6.12-rc6-mm1 + ordered patchset + 3 last blk fix patches. As I
> haven't posted ordered patchset against 2.6.12-rc6-mm1 (still waiting
> for your comments), to apply this patchset, you'll have to apply the
> ordered patchset against 2.6.12-rc5-mm2 to 2.6.12-rc6-mm1, and then
> apply these patches. libata changes will fail but it wouldn't matter
> for review purpose. (if you want ordered patchset against
> 2.6.12-rc6-mm1, I can send it to you, just tell me.)
>
> This patchset updates only noop and cfq io schedulers. as and
> deadline wouldn't compile w/ this patchset applied. I'll update as
> and deadline once some consensus regarding the general direction of
> this patchset is gained.
>
> This patchset is composed of two large parts.
>
> * Implementation of generic dispatch queue & updating individual
> elevators.
> * Move last_merge handling into generic elevator.
>
> Currently, each specific iosched maintains its own dispatch queue to
> handle ordering, requeueing, cluster dispatching, etc... This causes
> the following problems.
>
> * duplicated codes
> * difficult to enforce semantics over dispatch queue (request
> ordering, requeueing, ...)
> * specific ioscheds have to deal with non-fs or ordered requests
> directly.
>
> With generic dispatch queue, specific ioscheds are guaranteed to be
> handed only non-barrier fs requests, such that ioscheds only have to
> implement ordering logic of normal fs requests. Also, callback
> invocation is stricter now. Each fs request follows one of the
> following paths.
>
> * add_req_fn -> dispatch_fn -> activate_fn (-> deactivate_fn ->
> activate_fn)* -> completed_req_fn
> * add_req_fn -> merged_req_fn
Oops, sorry. I was being delusional. The following special case path
doesn't exist. It never reaches specific ioscheds, so it's just above
two paths.
> * add_req_fn -> dispatch_fn (This path is special case for barrier
> request. This can be easily removed by activating at the start of
> ordered sequence, and completing at the end. Would removing this
> path be better?)
--
tejun
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-06-16 6:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-06-16 4:56 [PATCH Linux 2.6.12-rc6-mm1 00/06] blk: generic dispatch queue (for review) Tejun Heo
2005-06-16 4:56 ` [PATCH Linux 2.6.12-rc6-mm1 01/06] blk: implement generic dispatch queue Tejun Heo
2005-06-16 4:56 ` [PATCH Linux 2.6.12-rc6-mm1 02/06] blk: update noop iosched to use " Tejun Heo
2005-06-16 4:56 ` [PATCH Linux 2.6.12-rc6-mm1 03/06] blk: update cfq " Tejun Heo
2005-06-16 4:56 ` [PATCH Linux 2.6.12-rc6-mm1 04/06] blk: move last_merge handling into generic elevator code Tejun Heo
2005-06-16 4:57 ` [PATCH Linux 2.6.12-rc6-mm1 05/06] blk: remove last_merge handling from noop iosched Tejun Heo
2005-06-16 4:57 ` [PATCH Linux 2.6.12-rc6-mm1 06/06] blk: remove last_merge handling from cfq iosched Tejun Heo
2005-06-16 6:19 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=42B119F7.6000709@gmail.com \
--to=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox