From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261830AbVFPVGC (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Jun 2005 17:06:02 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261832AbVFPVGC (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Jun 2005 17:06:02 -0400 Received: from 64-60-250-34.cust.telepacific.net ([64.60.250.34]:56762 "EHLO panta-1.pantasys.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261830AbVFPVFz (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Jun 2005 17:05:55 -0400 Message-ID: <42B1E9B2.30504@pantasys.com> Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 14:05:54 -0700 From: Peter Buckingham User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050602) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sean Bruno CC: Andreas Koch , Ivan Kokshaysky , Linus Torvalds , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@suse.de Subject: Re: PROBLEM: Devices behind PCI Express-to-PCI bridge not mapped References: <20050605204645.A28422@jurassic.park.msu.ru> <20050610184815.A13999@jurassic.park.msu.ru> <200506102247.30842.koch@esa.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de> <1118762382.9161.3.camel@home-lap> <20050616142039.GF21542@erebor.esa.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de> <42B1B4D3.3060600@pantasys.com> <1118955201.10529.10.camel@home-lap> In-Reply-To: <1118955201.10529.10.camel@home-lap> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.89.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Jun 2005 21:03:24.0968 (UTC) FILETIME=[D5FD2A80:01C572B6] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sean Bruno wrote: > Just for the record Peter, what motherboard r u using? This is a custom motherboard that we've developed in house :-( It is based on the nforce4 chipset. Looking at what I see in our lspci output we get strange values for the bars of the ATI device and the second Nvidia GPU, ie large negative values. The addresses for these devices also look strange and overlap. I tried applying the patches from this thread. They change the behaviour for the configuration of the BARs, but not actually the PCI addresses for these devices... I have a bunch more information on this if anyone is willing to take a look. peter