* Observation: very low USB performance in 2.6.12 (-2 from agnula)
@ 2005-06-20 18:13 Petter Sundlöf
2005-06-20 18:45 ` Adrian Bunk
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Petter Sundlöf @ 2005-06-20 18:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
I've observed that USB performance (mass storage) is severaly degraded
in 2.6.12. Going back to 2.6.10 restores performances to expected levels.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Observation: very low USB performance in 2.6.12 (-2 from agnula)
2005-06-20 18:13 Observation: very low USB performance in 2.6.12 (-2 from agnula) Petter Sundlöf
@ 2005-06-20 18:45 ` Adrian Bunk
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Adrian Bunk @ 2005-06-20 18:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Petter Sundlöf; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List
On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 08:13:48PM +0200, Petter Sundlöf wrote:
> I've observed that USB performance (mass storage) is severaly degraded
> in 2.6.12. Going back to 2.6.10 restores performances to expected levels.
Is CONFIG_BLK_DEV_UB enabled in your kernel?
If yes, does disabling it fix the problem?
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-06-20 18:45 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-06-20 18:13 Observation: very low USB performance in 2.6.12 (-2 from agnula) Petter Sundlöf
2005-06-20 18:45 ` Adrian Bunk
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox