From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261415AbVFTSNy (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Jun 2005 14:13:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261418AbVFTSNy (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Jun 2005 14:13:54 -0400 Received: from gl177a.glassen.ac ([82.182.223.101]:37058 "HELO findus.dhs.org") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S261415AbVFTSNx (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Jun 2005 14:13:53 -0400 Message-ID: <42B7075C.1090606@findus.dhs.org> Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 20:13:48 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?UGV0dGVyIFN1bmRsw7Zm?= User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050602) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Observation: very low USB performance in 2.6.12 (-2 from agnula) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I've observed that USB performance (mass storage) is severaly degraded in 2.6.12. Going back to 2.6.10 restores performances to expected levels.