* Observation: very low USB performance in 2.6.12 (-2 from agnula) @ 2005-06-20 18:13 Petter Sundlöf 2005-06-20 18:45 ` Adrian Bunk 0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread From: Petter Sundlöf @ 2005-06-20 18:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Linux Kernel Mailing List I've observed that USB performance (mass storage) is severaly degraded in 2.6.12. Going back to 2.6.10 restores performances to expected levels. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Observation: very low USB performance in 2.6.12 (-2 from agnula) 2005-06-20 18:13 Observation: very low USB performance in 2.6.12 (-2 from agnula) Petter Sundlöf @ 2005-06-20 18:45 ` Adrian Bunk 0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread From: Adrian Bunk @ 2005-06-20 18:45 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Petter Sundlöf; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 08:13:48PM +0200, Petter Sundlöf wrote: > I've observed that USB performance (mass storage) is severaly degraded > in 2.6.12. Going back to 2.6.10 restores performances to expected levels. Is CONFIG_BLK_DEV_UB enabled in your kernel? If yes, does disabling it fix the problem? cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-06-20 18:45 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2005-06-20 18:13 Observation: very low USB performance in 2.6.12 (-2 from agnula) Petter Sundlöf 2005-06-20 18:45 ` Adrian Bunk
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox