From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261567AbVFTUdI (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Jun 2005 16:33:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261581AbVFTUcw (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Jun 2005 16:32:52 -0400 Received: from soufre.accelance.net ([213.162.48.15]:63959 "EHLO soufre.accelance.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261567AbVFTU3i (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Jun 2005 16:29:38 -0400 Message-ID: <42B7272F.2040503@xenomai.org> Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 22:29:35 +0200 From: Philippe Gerum Organization: Xenomai User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050331) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pavel Machek CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] I-pipe: Core implementation References: <42B35B07.7080703@xenomai.org> <20050618170139.GA477@openzaurus.ucw.cz> In-Reply-To: <20050618170139.GA477@openzaurus.ucw.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > >> linux-2.6.12-rc6-ipipe-0.5/ipipe/Kconfig | 12 >> linux-2.6.12-rc6-ipipe-0.5/ipipe/Makefile | 9 >> linux-2.6.12-rc6-ipipe-0.5/ipipe/generic.c | 265 ++++++++++++ > > > Top-level directory for 3 files seems a bit excessive to me... > Pavel There's a fourth one (ipipe/x86.c) added by the arch-dependent patch, but yes, I agree that this could sound rather overkill to have this support in its own dir, especially a top-level one. The files under ipipe/ can be built as a loadable module, hence the current layout. Would you see this belonging to, e.g., the driver tree instead? -- Philippe.