From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261348AbVFUNCX (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jun 2005 09:02:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261383AbVFUNBo (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jun 2005 09:01:44 -0400 Received: from [85.8.12.41] ([85.8.12.41]:11192 "EHLO smtp.drzeus.cx") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261380AbVFUNA3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jun 2005 09:00:29 -0400 Message-ID: <42B80F40.8000609@drzeus.cx> Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 14:59:44 +0200 From: Pierre Ossman User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2-6 (X11/20050513) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Roman Zippel CC: kbuild-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH] Pointer cast warnings in scripts/ References: <42B7F740.6000807@drzeus.cx> <42B80AF9.2060708@drzeus.cx> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.1.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Roman Zippel wrote: > >http://linux.bkbits.net/ still works. > > > Thanks. It should only be a matter of reversing the patches for Solaris then. But that will of course bring back the warnings on that platform. I'd say we should stick with what the standard says. Unfortunatly I don't have access to the standard so I wouldn't know which is the correct version. If I'd have to guess I'd say the odds are in favor of glibc getting it more right than solaris. Should I extract the changes for bkbits and make a reversed patch? Rgds Pierre