Re: -mm -> 2.6.13 merge status

Andi Kleen
2005-06-21T19:59:06Z

On Tue, Jun 21, 2005 at 11:44:55AM -0700, Hans Reiser wrote:
> vs and zam, please comment on what we get from our profiler and spinlock
> debugger that the standard tools don't supply. I am sure you have a
> reason, but now is the time to articulate it.
>
> We would like to keep the disabled code in there until we have a chance
> to prove (or fail to prove) that cycle detection can be resolved
> effectively, and then with a solution in hand argue its merits.

How about the review of your code base? Has reiser4 ever been
fully reviewed by people outside your group?

Normally full review is a requirement for merging.

-Andi