From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org-S262931AbVFVIRc@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S262931AbVFVIRc (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Wed, 22 Jun 2005 04:17:32 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262929AbVFVIM7
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Wed, 22 Jun 2005 04:12:59 -0400
Received: from rwcrmhc11.comcast.net ([204.127.198.35]:41434 "EHLO
	rwcrmhc11.comcast.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S262872AbVFVIJ1 (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 22 Jun 2005 04:09:27 -0400
Message-ID: <42B91CB2.5070503@namesys.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 01:09:22 -0700
From: Hans Reiser <reiser@namesys.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041217
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
CC: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>, Alexander Lyamin aka FLX <flx@namesys.com>,
       Alexander Zarochentcev <zam@namesys.com>, vs <vs@thebsh.namesys.com>,
       Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       ReiserFS List <reiserfs-list@namesys.com>
Subject: Re: -mm -> 2.6.13 merge status
References: <20050620235458.5b437274.akpm@osdl.org.suse.lists.linux.kernel> <p73d5qgc67h.fsf@verdi.suse.de> <42B86027.3090001@namesys.com> <20050621195642.GD14251@wotan.suse.de> <42B8C0FF.2010800@namesys.com> <20050622015724.GN14251@wotan.suse.de> <42B8D314.3090900@namesys.com> <42B8D497.6020404@pobox.com>
In-Reply-To: <42B8D497.6020404@pobox.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.90.1.0
X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Jeff Garzik wrote:

>
>
> "Hans' team says its good stuff" is not a criteria for merging.
>
>    

Try benchmarking it.  Maybe benchmarks mean more than our
chattering..... at least to the users.....