public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Karim Yaghmour <karim@opersys.com>
To: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Bill Huey <bhuey@lnxw.com>,
	Kristian Benoit <kbenoit@opersys.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, paulmck@us.ibm.com, andrea@suse.de,
	tglx@linutronix.de, pmarques@grupopie.com, bruce@andrew.cmu.edu,
	nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au, ak@muc.de, sdietrich@mvista.com,
	dwalker@mvista.com, hch@infradead.org, akpm@osdl.org,
	rpm@xenomai.org
Subject: Re: PREEMPT_RT vs I-PIPE: the numbers, part 2
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 00:13:48 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <42BA36FC.5010408@opersys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1119499041.25270.38.camel@mindpipe>


Lee Revell wrote:
> Are you talking about the first run where you left all those expensive
> PREEMPT_RT debug options enabled?
> 
> IMHO those numbers should be taken down, they're completely meaningless.

That's just flamebait. Anyone who's ever read an LKML thread knows
better than to just trust the topmost parent. As for those who
don't read LKML very often, then the "Latest Results" is the section
they'll be most interested in and that specific section starts with
with a big fat warning.

You can label the results meaningless if you wish, suit yourself.

Karim
-- 
Author, Speaker, Developer, Consultant
Pushing Embedded and Real-Time Linux Systems Beyond the Limits
http://www.opersys.com || karim@opersys.com || 1-866-677-4546

  reply	other threads:[~2005-06-23  4:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-06-20 17:13 PREEMPT_RT vs I-PIPE: the numbers, part 2 Kristian Benoit
2005-06-20 18:31 ` Bill Huey
2005-06-22 16:00   ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-22 19:29     ` Bill Huey
2005-06-22 20:05       ` Ingo Molnar
2005-06-22 20:39         ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-22 22:04           ` Ingo Molnar
2005-06-22 23:03             ` Lee Revell
2005-06-22 23:52               ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-22 23:38             ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-22 23:57               ` Andrea Arcangeli
2005-06-23  0:05               ` Daniel Walker
2005-06-23  0:48                 ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-23  0:06               ` Ingo Molnar
2005-06-23  0:47                 ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-23  0:55                   ` Bill Huey
2005-06-23  1:09                     ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-23  1:15                       ` Bill Huey
2005-06-23  1:47                         ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-23  0:59                   ` David Lang
2005-06-23  1:22                     ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-23  1:42                       ` David Lang
2005-06-23  2:09                         ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-23  2:15                           ` David Lang
2005-06-23  1:34                   ` Ingo Molnar
2005-06-23  2:02                     ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-23  3:57                       ` Lee Revell
2005-06-23  4:13                         ` Karim Yaghmour [this message]
2005-06-22 20:10       ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-22 20:15         ` Bill Huey
2005-06-21  1:55 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-06-21  2:29   ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-22  1:19     ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-06-22 15:31       ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-22 15:27         ` Kristian Benoit
2005-06-22 16:27         ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-06-22 17:20           ` Kristian Benoit
2005-06-22 17:34             ` Ingo Molnar
2005-06-22 17:40               ` Ingo Molnar
2005-06-22 18:12                 ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-22 18:14                   ` Ingo Molnar
2005-06-22 19:04                     ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-22 18:50             ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-06-22 19:04               ` Ingo Molnar
2005-06-22 20:17                 ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-22 20:22                   ` Ingo Molnar
2005-06-22 21:03                     ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-22 21:10                       ` Ingo Molnar
2005-06-22 21:32                         ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-22 22:41                       ` Ingo Molnar
2005-06-22 23:02                         ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-22 21:20                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-06-22 19:08               ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-23 14:48             ` Paulo Marques
2005-06-22 17:58           ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-22 18:47             ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-06-22 19:16               ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-22 21:23                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2005-06-22 17:17         ` Lee Revell
2005-06-22 17:32           ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-06-29  7:43           ` PREEMPT_RT & threading IRQ 0 Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=42BA36FC.5010408@opersys.com \
    --to=karim@opersys.com \
    --cc=ak@muc.de \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=andrea@suse.de \
    --cc=bhuey@lnxw.com \
    --cc=bruce@andrew.cmu.edu \
    --cc=dwalker@mvista.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=kbenoit@opersys.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    --cc=paulmck@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=pmarques@grupopie.com \
    --cc=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
    --cc=rpm@xenomai.org \
    --cc=sdietrich@mvista.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox