From: Jamey Hicks <jamey.hicks@hp.com>
To: Russell King <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: dpervushin@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] SPI core -- revisited
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 08:56:44 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <42BC030C.50207@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050623174349.A12573@flint.arm.linux.org.uk>
Russell King wrote:
>On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 11:50:26AM -0400, Jamey Hicks wrote:
>
>
>>dmitry pervushin wrote:
>>
>>
>>>we finally decided to rework the SPI core and now it its ready for your comments..
>>>Here we have several boards equipped with SPI bus, and use this spi core with these boards;
>>>Drivers for them are available by request (...and if community approve this patch)
>>>
>>>
>>I'm glad to see that work is progressing on SPI core. I've worked on
>>drivers on both ARM linux and Blackfin uclinux that use SPI and would
>>prefer that they not be platform specific.
>>
>>
>
>I worry about SPI at the moment because I can't see how it's being used
>from just this code.
>
>The worry I have is that it appears to contain an algorithm layer. Would
>this be better as a library for drivers to use, or something like that?
>
>
>
That's a good point. I think the only algorithm that really gets shared
is the bitbanging one, which could be a library, and otherwise it is
controller specific and might as well be in the adapter.
Jamey
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-06-24 12:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-06-23 12:18 [RFC] SPI core -- revisited dmitry pervushin
2005-06-23 15:50 ` Jamey Hicks
2005-06-23 16:43 ` Russell King
2005-06-24 12:56 ` Jamey Hicks [this message]
2005-06-23 21:59 ` Jean Delvare
2005-06-24 0:35 ` Greg KH
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-06-26 19:36 dpervushin
2005-06-26 20:49 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2005-06-26 20:59 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-06-27 3:37 ` Vitaly Wool
2005-06-27 8:28 ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-06-27 9:13 ` Vitaly Wool
2005-06-27 9:20 ` Russell King
2005-06-27 10:20 ` Vitaly Wool
2005-06-28 16:49 ` Greg KH
2005-06-27 3:39 ` Vitaly Wool
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=42BC030C.50207@hp.com \
--to=jamey.hicks@hp.com \
--cc=dpervushin@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox