From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261288AbVFZAq1 (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Jun 2005 20:46:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261368AbVFZAq1 (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Jun 2005 20:46:27 -0400 Received: from mxout03.versatel.de ([212.7.152.117]:52874 "EHLO mxout03.versatel.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261288AbVFZApQ (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Jun 2005 20:45:16 -0400 Message-ID: <42BDFA8E.6060608@web.de> Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2005 02:45:02 +0200 From: Christian Trefzer User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050617) X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Hubert Chan CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, reiserfs-list@namesys.com Subject: Re: -mm -> 2.6.13 merge status References: <20050620235458.5b437274.akpm@osdl.org.suse.lists.linux.kernel> <42B86027.3090001@namesys.com> <20050621195642.GD14251@wotan.suse.de> <42B8C0FF.2010800@namesys.com> <84144f0205062223226d560e41@mail.gmail.com> <42BB0151.3030904@suse.de> <87fyv8h80y.fsf@evinrude.uhoreg.ca> In-Reply-To: <87fyv8h80y.fsf@evinrude.uhoreg.ca> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.0.0 OpenPGP: id=6B99E3A5 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig4215EEB3A6EEE9136AA59BA7" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig4215EEB3A6EEE9136AA59BA7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hubert Chan schrieb: > How about something of the form "nikita-955(file:line)"? Or the > reverse: "file:line(nikita-955)". Would that keep everyone happy? > Damn, I was wondering how long it would take until someone would come up with a compromise solution ; ) Compromises everywhere will lead to nowhere, I've learned that the hard way. But this is really not a major issue, so let's not make a showstopper out of this one and the likes. For what I know about the whole inclusion discussion until now, there's been a whole lot of flamewar chickenshit so far. Considering that I have no FS developing abilities whatsoever, I'm pretty pissed at people who do know better in their field and should know better than waste their time on discussions other than constructive ones. Get the personal bullshit out of the way, everyone, please! Get in touch and work out your differences in a productive manner. If every interesting yet at first intrusive extension to the kernel causes as much kindergarten as this one, where will we end up? Stagnation sucks, yet good progress is sometimes slow-paced... Peace, everyone! Chris (hardcore, not hippie) --------------enig4215EEB3A6EEE9136AA59BA7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQIVAwUBQr36kl2m8MprmeOlAQIRxA//fH196LTXn2kr2C76lQ3na6Mbw8H6vZU9 6GSg1GZaNr54/HlRIfns80Il4cZvIh4GdemSbKQXq1YUMY9Aia2UA7rnMplsriSd n12HLD65eDo3SFhh+GT2VsuvjJs08O2y/OJqqwcGCcWpD3AMcx5xm9vnZ3MgDk3R dirGLi6lxxArF0mSaZCP9fSLcNXz46PaSzYH6K3MeFwdih/Rq43tnjGlaUIv+9UP POtXmnGICLOeRRKhbKKbdDo17TPl/0ruVacL8TI4p1ru2T5oX2T7kukCzscbg+nx Vl0hj8ufRiu/z55wPesVza+JiZh5Ph7SvnHFeVDe7e+9V4D6iaGRGojKffPYLEYe 9xzCo49EFhTieDsw2K48fPWhy+/t95458sMgNoIwmpMkZHbOl4HpPEM6L/+L9lTR j8rcAK5YhWQYVD3MHgCKiQS93b0WEq0S/bt7un+bTXvpIuqjwBld59Jn/X17LQxt 5KZZ37zwyndYvAIO/0tRTiFhL3TFpl4nOAu9Tg5qeXgBbcaeFTUc9IzaxGeZmb4l ghrOJuGfYdINeBl++RIyU+bI2H/gBMKn+nTMlLsaF37/xVBsU7euKxn2ttrpZuSA 14DtkY2gR1W7O8BHOSZCjAX/sBDRHOv/9/AoVUwy7vVhE7KnxAPiOZ2fNP3NWcIb Ld/nuKgQoEk= =m+Po -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig4215EEB3A6EEE9136AA59BA7--