Pozsár Balázs schrieb:
> See http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/1/17/132
The patch was against 2.6.11-rc1, has it not been adapted into mainline? 
As far as I can see, most of the hunks were already applied, and some 
parts of the code have evolved further since. BTW, I never had this 
problem with any 2.6.11 until .12 so far.
Thanks for your pointer!