Re: [ckrm-tech] Re: [patch 02/38] CKRM e18: Processor Delay Accounting

Gerrit Huizenga
2005-06-24T07:32:51Z

On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 09:20:19 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Shailabh Nagar <nagar@watson.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> > Thanks. task_curr is what we needed. Would exporting task_curr be ok
> > or should we continue to wrap in a separate function ?
>
> wrapping a non-exported function and then exporting it is not nice at
> all (it circumvents the non-exported status of that original function).
> But we can internal-export (EXPORT_GPL) task_curr() itself.
>
> Ingo

That would work for us - this is a GPL'd module directed towards
mainline. No licensing issues to worry about.

gerrit