Re: [ckrm-tech] Re: [patch 02/38] CKRM e18: Processor Delay Accounting

Ingo Molnar
2005-06-24T07:20:58Z

* Shailabh Nagar <nagar@watson.ibm.com> wrote:

> Thanks. task_curr is what we needed. Would exporting task_curr be ok
> or should we continue to wrap in a separate function ?

wrapping a non-exported function and then exporting it is not nice at
all (it circumvents the non-exported status of that original function).
But we can internal-export (EXPORT_GPL) task_curr() itself.

Ingo