From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261216AbVGBQ0X (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Jul 2005 12:26:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261219AbVGBQ0X (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Jul 2005 12:26:23 -0400 Received: from [67.137.28.189] ([67.137.28.189]:55430 "EHLO vger") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261216AbVGBQ0P (ORCPT ); Sat, 2 Jul 2005 12:26:15 -0400 Message-ID: <42C6AB92.4080609@utah-nac.org> Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2005 08:58:26 -0600 From: jmerkey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040510 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jesper Juhl Cc: Alejandro Bonilla , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [OT] New Anti-Terrorism Law makes "hacking" punishable by life in prison References: <42C5DACA.2040507@utah-nac.org> <42C5E6E8.30009@linuxwireless.org> <42C5F143.3040305@utah-nac.org> <9a87484905070206264efea55a@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <9a87484905070206264efea55a@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org It's in the archives now, so the purpose is served. The sociopaths using the parent thread have just lost their toy. J Jesper Juhl wrote: >On 7/2/05, jmerkey wrote: > > >>OK. I ask for this thread and associated posts to be removed, is this >>is allowed. The Provo Daily Herald and KSL Channel 5 >>news asked me questions about it. I did not author it. >> >> >> >[...] > >I'd say that that request is damn near impossible. First of all, as >Randy has already pointet out kernel.org does not maintain email >archives, secondly, the thread will be archived on a number of >different sites outside kernel.org's control - there are *many* lkml >archives on the 'net. In addition to LKML archives you'd also have to >contact news sites that may have written articles on the thread and >copied the message(s) in part or in full, and then there is any number >of search engines that may have cached the thread and sites like The >Wayback Machine that may have cached the lkml archives or the news >sites etc etc etc... And finally you have a huge number of unknown >people who may have kept personal LKML archives on their private >machines going back several years - there's no way to identify those >people and certainly no way to get them to remove a specific thread >from their personal archives. >Once a message is posted to a public mailing list (especially one as >widely archived & commented on as LKML) it is practically impossible >to get rid of - there's always going to be someone somewhere that has >a copy. > > >