From: Daniel Drake <dsd@gentoo.org>
To: Anton Altaparmakov <aia21@cam.ac.uk>
Cc: "David Gómez" <david@pleyades.net>,
"Robert Love" <rml@novell.com>,
"John McCutchan" <ttb@tentacle.dhs.org>,
Linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Problem with inotify
Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2005 00:38:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <42C72563.7040103@gentoo.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.60.0507022253080.30401@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk>
Hi Anton,
Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
> Thinking about it some more made me realize that there may be a problem in
> inotify after all... Could you try the below patch to fs/inotify.c and
> tell me if it cures the lockup you are seeing? (Note patch compiles but
> is otherwise untested. But given it locks up without the patch it can't
> do much worse with it!)
Thanks for writing that patch, the effort is much appreciated. Unfortunately
it does not help :(
I've done a bit more investigating for you though. I did some tests purely on
the console, using inotify-test (from inotify-utils) which is the most
simplistic way you can use inotify: it just prints out the recieved events to
the screen.
I found out that unmount works perfectly well as long as there are no active
inotify watches (this might be quite obvious though!) - i.e. closing
inotify-test before unmounting results in a clean unmount. Unmounting while
inotify-test is watching the NTFS partition causes the freeze.
When the machine freezes, it still responds to ping, but not to ssh. Sysrq
works, so I got a sysrq-p trace:
Pid 8997 comm umount
EIP is at inotify_unmount_inodes+0x38/0x140
stack trace:
invalidate_inodes+0x40/0x90
generic_shutdown_super+0x59/0x140
kill_block_super+0x2d/0x50
deactivate_super+0x5a/0x90
sys_umount+0x3f/0x90
filp_close+0x52/0xa0
sys_oldumount+0x17/0x20
sysenter_past_esp+0x54/0x75
Investigating that function:
(gdb) list *inotify_unmount_inodes+0x38
0x9c8 is in inotify_unmount_inodes (inotify.c:565).
560 */
561 void inotify_unmount_inodes(struct list_head *list)
562 {
563 struct inode *inode, *next_i, *need_iput = NULL;
564
565 list_for_each_entry_safe(inode, next_i, list, i_sb_list) {
566 struct inode *need_iput_tmp;
567 struct inotify_watch *watch, *next_w;
568 struct list_head *watches;
569
I then added a loop counter printk in at line 569 above. It shows that the
loop iterates 8 times on a clean unmount, and goes into a seemingly infinite
loop (i.e. freeze) when unmounting with inotify watches active.
I don't know much about filesystem internals so I'm pretty stuck here, haven't
reached that chapter of Robert's book yet ;)
Please let me know if theres any other info I can provide.
Thanks,
Daniel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-07-02 23:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-06-30 18:18 Problem with inotify David Gómez
2005-06-30 18:29 ` Robert Love
2005-06-30 18:38 ` David Gómez
2005-06-30 19:33 ` David Gómez
2005-06-30 20:39 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2005-06-30 20:48 ` David Gómez
2005-06-30 22:35 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2005-07-01 20:25 ` Robert Love
2005-07-02 12:54 ` David Gómez
2005-07-02 16:25 ` Robert Love
2005-07-02 9:12 ` Daniel Drake
2005-07-02 22:09 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2005-07-02 23:38 ` Daniel Drake [this message]
2005-07-03 0:08 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2005-07-03 10:34 ` Daniel Drake
2005-07-04 14:27 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2005-07-04 14:39 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2005-07-04 15:12 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2005-07-04 15:55 ` Gautam Singaraju
2005-07-04 16:00 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2005-07-04 17:57 ` Daniel Drake
2005-07-04 19:09 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2005-07-05 1:33 ` John McCutchan
2005-07-05 7:56 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2005-07-05 15:48 ` John McCutchan
2005-07-05 17:06 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2005-07-05 18:07 ` John McCutchan
2005-07-05 20:53 ` Anton Altaparmakov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=42C72563.7040103@gentoo.org \
--to=dsd@gentoo.org \
--cc=aia21@cam.ac.uk \
--cc=david@pleyades.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rml@novell.com \
--cc=ttb@tentacle.dhs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox