public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter <peter.spamcatcher@rimuhosting.com>
To: Blaisorblade <blaisorblade@yahoo.it>
Cc: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: unregister_netdevice: waiting for tap24 to become free
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 10:26:52 +1200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <42D2F22C.3060102@rimuhosting.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200507120020.52418.blaisorblade@yahoo.it>

Nothing in the logs prior to the first error message.

I've hit this before at different times on other servers.  If there are 
some commands I can run to gather more diagnostics on the problem, 
please let me know and I'll capture more information next time.

I see the error was reported with older 2.6 kernels and a patch was 
floating around.  I'm not sure if that is integrated into the current 
2.6.11 kernel. 
http://www.google.com/search?q=unregister_netdevice%3A+waiting

Regards, Peter

Jul 10 16:52:03 host39 sshd(pam_unix)[19779]: authentication failure; 
logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=140.123.23.77  user=halt
Jul 10 16:52:07 host39 sshd(pam_unix)[19781]: check pass; user unknown
Jul 10 16:52:07 host39 sshd(pam_unix)[19781]: authentication failure; 
logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=140.123.23.77
Jul 11 12:04:04 host39 kernel: unregister_netdevice: waiting for tap24 
to become free. Usage count = 1


Blaisorblade wrote:
> On Monday 11 July 2005 21:12, Peter wrote:
> 
>>Hi.  I am hitting a bug that manifests in an unregister_netdevice error
>>message.  After the problem is triggered processes like ifconfig, tunctl
>>and route refuse to exit, even with killed.
> 
> Even from the "D" state below, it's clear that there was a deadlock on some 
> semaphore, related to tap24... Could you search your kernel logs for traces 
> of an Oops?
> 
>>And the only solution I 
>>have found to regaining control of the server is issuing a reboot.
> 
> 
>>The server is running a number of tap devices.  (It is a UML host server
>>running the skas patches http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade/).
>>
>>Regards, Peter
>>
>># uname -r
>>2.6.11.7-skas3-v8
>>
>>unregister_netdevice: waiting for tap24 to become free. Usage count = 1
>>unregister_netdevice: waiting for tap24 to become free. Usage count = 1
>>unregister_netdevice: waiting for tap24 to become free. Usage count = 1
>>unregister_netdevice: waiting for tap24 to become free. Usage count = 1
>>unregister_netdevice: waiting for tap24 to become free. Usage count = 1
>>unregister_netdevice: waiting for tap24 to become free. Usage count = 1
>>unregister_netdevice: waiting for tap24 to become free. Usage count = 1
>>
>>
>>30684 ?        DW     0:45          \_ [tunctl]
>>31974 ?        S      0:00 /bin/bash ./monitorbw.sh
>>31976 ?        S      0:00  \_ /bin/bash ./monitorbw.sh
>>31978 ?        D      0:00      \_ /sbin/ifconfig
>>31979 ?        S      0:00      \_ grep \(tap\)\|\(RX bytes\)
>>32052 ?        S      0:00 /bin/bash /opt/uml/umlcontrol.sh start --user
>>gildersleeve.de
>>32112 ?        S      0:00  \_ /bin/bash /opt/uml/umlrun.sh --user
>>gildersleeve.de
>>32152 ?        S      0:00      \_ /bin/bash ./umlnetworksetup.sh
>>--check --user gildersleeve.de
>>32176 ?        D      0:00          \_ tunctl -u gildersleeve.de -t tap24
>>

  reply	other threads:[~2005-07-11 22:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-07-09 11:01 [patch 1/1] uml: fix lvalue for gcc4 blaisorblade
2005-07-09 11:07 ` Russell King
2005-07-11 19:12   ` unregister_netdevice: waiting for tap24 to become free Peter
2005-07-11 22:20     ` [uml-devel] " Blaisorblade
2005-07-11 22:26       ` Peter [this message]
2005-07-11 22:47         ` Blaisorblade
2005-07-14  9:20           ` [uml-devel] " Peter
2005-07-11 22:05   ` [uml-devel] Re: [patch 1/1] uml: fix lvalue for gcc4 Blaisorblade

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=42D2F22C.3060102@rimuhosting.com \
    --to=peter.spamcatcher@rimuhosting.com \
    --cc=blaisorblade@yahoo.it \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox