public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Heinz <thomasheinz@gmx.net>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: SCSI DVD-RAM partitions
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 10:23:17 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <42D37DF5.6060902@gmx.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050712023757.GG26128@infradead.org>

Hi Christoph

You wrote:
> While adding support for partitions on sr is trivial it has a huge
> drawback: it's chaning the dev_t space by using up device numbers
> for partitions, so /dev/sr0 ff will have different device numbers
> with that change applied.  I have an old patch that's supposed to
> enable support for partitioned scsi removable devices at
> http://rechner.lst.de/~hch/hacks/sr-parts.diff, I'm not sure it
> actually ever worked (but you should get the basic idea from it)

Ok, thanks for your valuable input. In fact, I thought about making
the device available both as /dev/srX and /dev/sdX at the same time
in order to support partitions. In my case it would even suffice to
make it available as /dev/sdX instead of /dev/srX.

Since I have no expert knowledge about this topic, I would be
interested in the general attitude towards "partitions on SCSI
DVD-RAM media / SCSI removable devices":
- Are partitions intentionally not supported? If so, why?
- Does it usually work but not with my specific DVD-RAM model?
   If so, why?
- Do you think that this should be fixed?


Please note that personally, I can live with the "losetup hack"
since it is easy enough to write a program which encapsulates
partition mounting. However, there might be people which would
prefer plugging in a (possibly pre-)partitioned medium and
having the partitions work out of the box in the expected way.


Regards,

Thomas

  reply	other threads:[~2005-07-12  8:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-07-09 12:32 SCSI DVD-RAM partitions Thomas Heinz
2005-07-12  2:37 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-07-12  8:23   ` Thomas Heinz [this message]
2005-07-31 14:01     ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-08-05 17:02       ` Thomas Heinz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=42D37DF5.6060902@gmx.net \
    --to=thomasheinz@gmx.net \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox