From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262444AbVGLXaN (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jul 2005 19:30:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262248AbVGLXaN (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jul 2005 19:30:13 -0400 Received: from delta.securenet-server.net ([72.9.248.26]:64395 "EHLO delta.securenet-server.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262444AbVGLXaE (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jul 2005 19:30:04 -0400 Message-ID: <42D4526E.2040409@machinehasnoagenda.com> Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 09:29:50 +1000 From: "Shayne O'Connor" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2-1.3.3 (X11/20050513) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: A list for linux audio users CC: mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [linux-audio-user] Problems appling realtime preempt patch to 2.6.12 References: <42D38C00.1040800@telus.net> <42D3C152.2010602@machinehasnoagenda.com> <42D420B9.5070401@telus.net> <1121200732.10580.19.camel@mindpipe> <42D42F9A.40806@telus.net> In-Reply-To: <42D42F9A.40806@telus.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PopBeforeSMTPSenders: forums@machinehasnoagenda.com,machine@machinehasnoagenda.com,shunichi@machinehasnoagenda.com X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - delta.securenet-server.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - vger.kernel.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - machinehasnoagenda.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Iain Duncan wrote: >>>> yeah, i got this as well ... hasn't seemed to have any noticeable >>>> effects, though. >>> >>> >>> Huh? Does that mean the kernel image is built anyway? I was under the >>> impression that it meant it didn't finish compiling? Am I confused? >> >> >> >> If the error was in building a module that you don't use, then it would >> be harmless. This seems to be the case. > > > Ah, excuse my ignorance please, but does that mean the rest *did* build, > or I need to somehow comment out building that module and do it again? > And if so, how would I do that? In the kernel makefile? > hmmm ... when i built mine, i didn't get that message until doing: sudo make modules_install ... it went through the process of installing the modules, and then - the very last line - it gave me: > : undefined reference to `there_is_no_init_MUTEX_LOCKED_for_RT_semaphores' and it also gave me the same deal when doing: sudo make install. so, unless it compiled all the drivers/modules *before* exiting with error, i would try to find out the driver/module that is failing to compile, assess whether you need it or not, and try again (using "make gconfig"). shayne