From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org-S263139AbVGOCFW@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S263139AbVGOCFW (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Thu, 14 Jul 2005 22:05:22 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263146AbVGOCD4
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Thu, 14 Jul 2005 22:03:56 -0400
Received: from zcars04e.nortelnetworks.com ([47.129.242.56]:54014 "EHLO
	zcars04e.ca.nortel.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S263148AbVGOCDW (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 14 Jul 2005 22:03:22 -0400
Message-ID: <42D71950.20303@nortel.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 20:02:56 -0600
X-Sybari-Space: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
From: Chris Friesen <cfriesen@nortel.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040115
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
CC: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>, Mark Gross <mgross@linux.intel.com>,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Why is 2.6.12.2 less stable on my laptop than 2.6.10?
References: <200507140912.22532.mgross@linux.intel.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>	 <p73wtnsx5r1.fsf@bragg.suse.de> <9a8748490507141845162c0f19@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <9a8748490507141845162c0f19@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Jesper Juhl wrote:

> In my oppinion it would be nice if Linus/Andrew had some basic
> regression tests they could run on kernels before releasing them.

How do you regression test behaviour on broken hardware (and BIOSes) 
that you don't have?

Chris