public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hareesh Nagarajan <hareesh@google.com>
To: Tom Zanussi <zanussi@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, karim@opersys.com,
	varap@us.ibm.com, richardj_moore@uk.ibm.com
Subject: Re: Merging relayfs?
Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2005 22:17:13 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <42DB3B59.1080006@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <17114.32450.420164.971783@tut.ibm.com>

Tom Zanussi wrote:
> Roman Zippel writes:
>  > Hi,
>  > 
>  > On Thu, 14 Jul 2005, Tom Zanussi wrote:
>  > 
>  > > The netlink control channel seems to work very well, but I can
>  > > certainly change the examples to use something different.  Could you
>  > > suggest something?
>  > 
>  > It just looks like a complicated way to do an ioctl, a control file that 
>  > you can read/write would be a lot simpler and faster.
> 
> You're right - in previous versions, we did use ioctl - we ended up
> using netlink as it seemed like least offensive option to most people.
> I'll try modifying the example code to use a control file or something
> like that instead though.

Having an ioctl() interface will definitely make things less 
complicated. Are the older versions which use ioctl available off the 
relayfs website?

I'm not quite sure if my opinion matters but I'd like to see relayfs 
merged. To me it appears to be the quickest and cleanest way to export 
trace data from the kernel to userspace.

Thanks,

Hareesh Nagarajan
-= Engineering Intern =-

  reply	other threads:[~2005-07-18  5:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 89+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-07-12  1:10 Merging relayfs? Tom Zanussi
2005-07-12  1:45 ` Andrew Morton
2005-07-12  2:17   ` Dave Airlie
2005-07-12  2:22   ` Tom Zanussi
2005-07-12  9:12     ` Baruch Even
2005-07-12  2:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-07-12  2:34   ` Andrew Morton
2005-07-12  2:59     ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-07-14 13:26     ` Roman Zippel
2005-07-14 15:01       ` Tom Zanussi
2005-07-17 14:04         ` Roman Zippel
2005-07-17 15:52           ` Tom Zanussi
2005-07-18  5:17             ` Hareesh Nagarajan [this message]
2005-07-18 14:31               ` Tom Zanussi
2005-07-18 13:44             ` Steven Rostedt
2005-07-18 14:16               ` Roman Zippel
2005-07-18 14:32                 ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-07-18 15:20                   ` Roman Zippel
2005-07-18 15:58                     ` Tom Zanussi
2005-07-22 20:43                       ` Tom Zanussi
2005-07-22 23:19                         ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-07-23  2:31                           ` Tom Zanussi
2005-07-26  2:35                             ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-07-22 20:43                       ` Tom Zanussi
2005-07-18 14:36                 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-07-18 15:06                   ` Roman Zippel
2005-07-18 14:41               ` Tom Zanussi
2005-07-18  8:40         ` Richard J Moore
2005-07-12 13:03   ` Steven Rostedt
2005-07-12  3:05 ` Greg KH
2005-07-12  3:03   ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-07-12  3:24     ` Greg KH
2005-07-12  3:52       ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-07-12  4:30         ` Greg KH
2005-07-12  4:40           ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-07-12  5:23             ` Greg KH
2005-07-12 14:36               ` Steve Rotolo
2005-07-12  3:55       ` Tom Zanussi
2005-07-12  4:27         ` Greg KH
2005-07-12 14:01 ` Tomasz Kłoczko
2005-07-12 14:21   ` Baruch Even
2005-07-12 15:30     ` Tomasz Kłoczko
2005-07-12 15:16   ` Tom Zanussi
2005-07-12 15:44     ` Tomasz Kłoczko
2005-07-12 16:27       ` Tom Zanussi
2005-07-12 17:01         ` Tomasz Kłoczko
2005-07-12 17:23           ` Tom Zanussi
     [not found]             ` <Pine.BSO.4.62.0507121935500.6919@rudy.mif.pg.gda.pl>
     [not found]               ` <17108.1906.628755.613285@tut.ibm.com>
     [not found]                 ` <Pine.BSO.4.62.0507122026520.6919@rudy.mif.pg.gda.pl>
     [not found]                   ` <17108.5721.202275.377020@tut.ibm.com>
2005-07-12 19:29                     ` Tomasz Kłoczko
2005-07-12 20:44                       ` Vara Prasad
2005-07-12 21:02               ` Vara Prasad
2005-07-13 12:40                 ` Tomasz Kłoczko
2005-07-13 15:04                   ` Vara Prasad
2005-07-13 16:22                     ` Tomasz Kłoczko
2005-07-13  4:29           ` Vara Prasad
2005-07-13 13:47             ` Tomasz Kłoczko
2005-07-13 15:55               ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-07-13 15:56               ` Vara Prasad
2005-07-13 16:50                 ` Tomasz Kłoczko
2005-07-12 14:58 ` Jason Baron
2005-07-12 15:26   ` Tom Zanussi
2005-07-12 16:00     ` Steven Rostedt
2005-07-12 15:53   ` Steven Rostedt
2005-07-12 16:08     ` Tom Zanussi
2005-07-12 16:23       ` Steven Rostedt
2005-07-12 16:36         ` Tom Zanussi
2005-07-12 16:49           ` Steven Rostedt
2005-07-12 17:01             ` Tom Zanussi
2005-07-12 21:38               ` Tom Zanussi
2005-07-12 23:40                 ` Steven Rostedt
2005-07-12 23:55                   ` Andrew Morton
2005-07-13  0:08                     ` Steven Rostedt
2005-07-16 21:07 ` relayfs documentation sucks? bert hubert
2005-07-16 23:13   ` Tom Zanussi
2005-07-17  9:01     ` [PATCH] " bert hubert
2005-07-17 15:43       ` Tom Zanussi
2005-07-17 19:45         ` bert hubert
2005-07-17 20:47           ` Tom Zanussi
2005-07-18 13:27           ` Steven Rostedt
2005-07-20 21:27             ` Paul Jackson
2005-07-20 21:45               ` bert hubert
2005-07-21  0:31                 ` Paul Jackson
2005-07-22 20:01                 ` Paul Jackson
2005-07-22 20:33                   ` relayfs as infrastructure, ltt, systemtap, diskstat bert hubert
2005-07-23 18:53                     ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-07-23 18:53                   ` [PATCH] Re: relayfs documentation sucks? Christoph Hellwig
2005-07-25 23:47                     ` Karim Yaghmour
2005-07-26  5:15                       ` bert hubert
     [not found] <17107.6290.734560.231978@tut.ibm.com.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
     [not found] ` <20050712022537.GA26128@infradead.org.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
     [not found]   ` <20050711193409.043ecb14.akpm@osdl.org.suse.lists.linux.kernel>
2005-07-12  4:36     ` Merging relayfs? Andi Kleen
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-07-13  8:13 Spirakis, Charles

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=42DB3B59.1080006@google.com \
    --to=hareesh@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=karim@opersys.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=richardj_moore@uk.ibm.com \
    --cc=varap@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=zanussi@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=zippel@linux-m68k.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox