From: Michal Schmidt <xschmi00@stud.feec.vutbr.cz>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Andreas Steinmetz <ast@domdv.de>, Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>,
Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: amd64-agp vs. swsusp
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 03:25:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <42DEF96E.60103@stud.feec.vutbr.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200507210123.16537.rjw@sisk.pl>
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, 21 of July 2005 00:07, Michal Schmidt wrote:
>>I also tried putting a printk before restore_processor_state(), but I'm
>>not sure if it is safe to use printk there.
>
>
> Yes, it is, but you may be unable to see the message if the box reboots before
> it can be displayed.
OK, but then I also tried putting a 5s long busy wait there and the
reset was not delayed. Therefore, the reset must be occurring before
restore_processor_state().
Or is there a reason why
for(i=0; i<5000; i++)
udelay(1000);
wouldn't work as expected?
Michal
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-07-21 1:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-07-19 20:51 amd64-agp vs. swsusp Michal Schmidt
2005-07-19 21:03 ` Andreas Steinmetz
2005-07-19 21:26 ` Michal Schmidt
2005-07-20 9:15 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-07-20 22:07 ` Michal Schmidt
2005-07-20 23:23 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-07-21 1:25 ` Michal Schmidt [this message]
2005-07-21 9:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-07-21 5:31 ` Pavel Machek
2005-07-21 10:43 ` Michal Schmidt
2005-07-21 15:20 ` Pavel Machek
2005-07-21 15:24 ` Michal Schmidt
2005-07-21 20:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2005-08-04 21:25 ` Andrew Morton
2005-08-04 21:40 ` Pavel Machek
2005-08-07 22:17 ` Michal Schmidt
2005-08-04 21:54 ` Cal Peake
2005-08-05 10:32 ` Andreas Steinmetz
2005-08-05 22:38 ` Cal Peake
2005-08-06 10:40 ` Andreas Steinmetz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=42DEF96E.60103@stud.feec.vutbr.cz \
--to=xschmi00@stud.feec.vutbr.cz \
--cc=ast@domdv.de \
--cc=davej@codemonkey.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox