From: Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
jesper.juhl@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.13-rc3 Battery times at 100/250/1000 Hz = Zero difference
Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 14:30:45 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <42E52FD5.7050705@tmr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050725102103.GG5837@atomide.com>
Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Voluspa <lista1@telia.com> [050722 11:46]:
>
>>On Fri, 22 Jul 2005 20:02:36 +0200 Pavel Machek wrote:
>>
>>>will not help. It seems like your machine is simply not able to do
>>>reasonable powersaving.
>>
>>Digging up this patch from last month regarding C2 on a AMD K7 implies
>>that the whole blame can be put on kernel acpi:
>>
>>http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=111933745131301&w=2
>
>
> AFAIK Linux ACPI expects BIOS to contain all the necessary stuff to enable
> C2 and C3. Otherwise they won't get enabled, and you have to create a custom
> module like the amd76x_pm is.
Does that imply that Windows actually has such non-BIOS code, or just
knows how to find the BIOS code better, or knows how to do other things,
or ???
>
> There's been some talk on adding a module to enable C2 and C3 states for
> various chipsets, but nobody seems to have enough time to do it...
I like your first thought better, "Linux ACPI expects BIOS to contain
all the necessary stuff" I have a bunch of laptops of various ages, and
I would expect at least the most recent, an ASUS 16??, using a
"Centrino" chipset, to be supported. It's one of the top few laptopl
chipsets, and Windows can suspecd it. Can also not only detect but use
the 1400x1050 screen, but that's another issue :-(
Is it possible that the code to find these capabilities is not fully
functional? That seems more likely than the system not having the
capability. NOTE: "seems" as in experienced guess unsupported by other
relevant information.
--
-bill davidsen (davidsen@tmr.com)
"The secret to procrastination is to put things off until the
last possible moment - but no longer" -me
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-07-25 19:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-07-21 18:04 2.6.13-rc3 Battery times at 100/250/1000 Hz = Zero difference Voluspa
2005-07-21 18:14 ` Jesper Juhl
2005-07-21 18:33 ` Voluspa
2005-07-22 14:48 ` Pavel Machek
2005-07-22 17:15 ` Voluspa
2005-07-22 18:02 ` Pavel Machek
2005-07-22 18:28 ` Voluspa
2005-07-22 18:44 ` Voluspa
2005-07-25 10:21 ` Tony Lindgren
2005-07-25 18:30 ` Bill Davidsen [this message]
2005-07-21 18:49 ` Guillaume Chazarain
2005-07-21 19:01 ` Voluspa
2005-07-26 13:14 ` Vojtech Pavlik
2005-07-26 14:53 ` Voluspa
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-07-26 5:23 Brown, Len
2005-07-26 14:52 ` Bill Davidsen
2005-07-26 6:29 Voluspa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=42E52FD5.7050705@tmr.com \
--to=davidsen@tmr.com \
--cc=jesper.juhl@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox