From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261470AbVGYXzj (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jul 2005 19:55:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261466AbVGYXzj (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jul 2005 19:55:39 -0400 Received: from opersys.com ([64.40.108.71]:60432 "EHLO www.opersys.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261470AbVGYXzh (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jul 2005 19:55:37 -0400 Message-ID: <42E57A21.6020002@opersys.com> Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 19:47:45 -0400 From: Karim Yaghmour Reply-To: karim@opersys.com Organization: Opersys inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040805 Netscape/7.2 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, fr, fr-be, fr-ca, fr-fr MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Christoph Hellwig CC: Paul Jackson , bert hubert , rostedt@goodmis.org, relayfs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, richardj_moore@uk.ibm.com, varap@us.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, zanussi@us.ibm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: relayfs documentation sucks? References: <17107.6290.734560.231978@tut.ibm.com> <20050716210759.GA1850@outpost.ds9a.nl> <17113.38067.551471.862551@tut.ibm.com> <20050717090137.GB5161@outpost.ds9a.nl> <17114.31916.451621.501383@tut.ibm.com> <20050717194558.GC27353@outpost.ds9a.nl> <1121693274.12862.15.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050720142732.761354de.pj@sgi.com> <20050720214519.GA13155@outpost.ds9a.nl> <20050722130132.60f1524e.pj@sgi.com> <20050723185303.GB7934@infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <20050723185303.GB7934@infradead.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Christoph Hellwig wrote: > That beein said I wish LTT folks would make a little more progress so > we could actually include it. We're working on it. On the topic of revamping LTT, 3 different people came up with 3 different implementations. Following your feedback on the patch I sent a few weeks back, I headed out asking myself "what is the bare-minimum tracing functionality that will actually fly while still being flexible enough to add to it?" I spent some time at the OLS comparing notes with others interested in this area, and I think we've got something that should fit the bill. We should be able to post something sooner rather than later. Now if only I could remember what I talked about after I left the Black Thorn at 2h45am and the guy in the elevator at Les Suites pressed on a button and said "'M' for more beer" ... Thanks, Karim -- Author, Speaker, Developer, Consultant Pushing Embedded and Real-Time Linux Systems Beyond the Limits http://www.opersys.com || karim@opersys.com || 1-866-677-4546