From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261923AbVGZP44 (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jul 2005 11:56:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261908AbVGZP4i (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jul 2005 11:56:38 -0400 Received: from mail.dvmed.net ([216.237.124.58]:54969 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261923AbVGZPzz (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 Jul 2005 11:55:55 -0400 Message-ID: <42E65D06.3050405@pobox.com> Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 11:55:50 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6-1.1.fc4 (X11/20050720) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tejun Heo CC: axboe@suse.de, James.Bottomley@steeleye.com, bzolnier@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-2.6-block:master 07/10] blk: add FUA support to libata References: <20050726154457.38D60C67@htj.dyndns.org> <20050726154457.4305D013@htj.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <20050726154457.4305D013@htj.dyndns.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Tejun Heo wrote: > 07_blk_libata-add-fua-support.patch > > Add FUA support to libata. NAK -- doesn't appear to take into account that read/write(6) don't support FUA. Correct me if I'm wrong. Otherwise, looks OK.