From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262123AbVG1SZ6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jul 2005 14:25:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262125AbVG1SXw (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jul 2005 14:23:52 -0400 Received: from mail.portrix.net ([212.202.157.208]:47256 "EHLO zoidberg.portrix.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262126AbVG1SXD (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jul 2005 14:23:03 -0400 Message-ID: <42E92280.6070400@ppp0.net> Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 20:22:56 +0200 From: Jan Dittmer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.6) Gecko/20050602 Thunderbird/1.0.2 Mnenhy/0.6.0.104 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Miles Bader CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: v850, which gcc and binutils version? References: <42E78474.8070300@ppp0.net> <42E896EC.7030503@ppp0.net> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.91.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Miles Bader wrote: > Jan Dittmer writes: > >>>"v850e-elf". >> >>Thanks, that got me much further, compilation aborts now with > > > Hmmm, what sources are you compiling exactly? -rc3-mm3; but if the error was no toolchain bug I won't try much further. The important thing to me was, that my compile tests now produce somewhat meaningful results for this platform. > I last tested with 2.6.12 + 2.6.12-uc0 (uClinux) patches + the v850 patches > I sent to the LKML recently (from which I presume you got the defconfigs); > the v850 patches should now be merged into Linus's tree, but I dunno about I suppose your patches don't apply cleanly against 2.6.12-uc0 ? Thanks, -- Jan http://l4x.org/k/