From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262992AbVG3QBg (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Jul 2005 12:01:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262995AbVG3QBf (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Jul 2005 12:01:35 -0400 Received: from 69.36.162.216.west-datacenter.net ([69.36.162.216]:35296 "EHLO schau.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262992AbVG3QBd (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Jul 2005 12:01:33 -0400 Message-ID: <42EBA482.2040006@schau.com> Date: Sat, 30 Jul 2005 18:02:10 +0200 From: Brian Schau User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Wireless Security Lock driver. References: <42EB940E.5000008@schau.com> <42EB9650.8010305@m1k.net> <42EB99D6.1020907@schau.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org *Grrr* - it's the mailer (I'm using Mozilla Thunderbird). I don't know why it has chosen to fold those two lines. The section looks like: + struct usb_wsl *wsl=urb->context; + int id=0, retval; + + switch (urb->status) { + case -ECONNRESET: /brian Zwane Mwaikambo wrote: > On Sat, 30 Jul 2005, Brian Schau wrote: > > >>Hi Michael (and others), >> >> >>Thanks for the info. Well, the reason why I didn't inline the patch >>was due to the size of it - in terms of lines. However, here it is: > > >>+static void wsl_irq_in(struct urb *urb, struct pt_regs *regs) >>+{ >>+ struct usb_wsl *wsl=urb->context; >>+ int id=0, retval; >>+ + switch (urb->status) { <========== >>+ case -ECONNRESET: > > > There is something wrong with your patch or mailer. > >