From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261168AbVHAJT1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Aug 2005 05:19:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262042AbVHAJT0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Aug 2005 05:19:26 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.177]:59087 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261168AbVHAJTZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Aug 2005 05:19:25 -0400 Message-ID: <42EDE918.9040807@gmx.net> Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2005 11:19:20 +0200 From: Otto Meier User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050715) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Driver for sata adapter promise sata300 tx4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de login:a9159ed0296f17902404cf1c2ac7671c Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, This card use the sata chip pdc 40718 (as of my card) the lastest sata_promise kernel with sata promise patch driver doesn't recognise this card. I added the following line to static struct pci_device_id pdc_ata_pci_tbl[] in sata_promise.c: { PCI_VENDOR_ID_PROMISE, 0x3d17, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, board_20319 }, and the card was recognised and seam to work without errors so far. bilding a soft raid5 on it and moving data doesn't broke it. It would be interesting to hear from the guru's if this is ok to do?. Otto