From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262078AbVHAOoN (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Aug 2005 10:44:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262226AbVHAOmI (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Aug 2005 10:42:08 -0400 Received: from [81.103.221.47] ([81.103.221.47]:549 "EHLO mta07-winn.ispmail.ntl.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262219AbVHAOl7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Aug 2005 10:41:59 -0400 Message-ID: <42EE3501.7010107@gentoo.org> Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2005 15:43:13 +0100 From: Daniel Drake User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050723) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Otto Meier Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Driver for sata adapter promise sata300 tx4 References: <42EDE918.9040807@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <42EDE918.9040807@gmx.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Otto Meier wrote: > This card use the sata chip pdc 40718 (as of my card) > the lastest sata_promise kernel with sata promise patch driver doesn't > recognise > this card. > > I added the following line to static struct pci_device_id > pdc_ata_pci_tbl[] in sata_promise.c: > > { PCI_VENDOR_ID_PROMISE, 0x3d17, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, 0, > board_20319 }, > > and the card was recognised and seam to work without errors so far. Yes, this should be fine (this is a 4-port SATA card right?) Are you happy to produce and submit a patch yourself (read Documentation/SubmittingPatches) or should I submit one for you? Thanks, Daniel